Skip to main content
Glama
lonexreb

io.github.lonexreb/retractguard

by lonexreb

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.lonexreb/retractguard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables researchers and AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency from BibTeX entries, resolve DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers, and compare results across multiple metadata sources. It supports non-destructive checks, explainable matching, and structured provider outcomes through the official MCP SDK.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.
      3
      13 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to audit academic citation contexts, calculate scientific consensus ratios, and generate credibility badge indexes for verified citations through MCP-compliant tools.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic records and metadata consistency across sources like Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and arXiv without destructive edits to the source .bib file. It exposes identifier-first lookup, explainable multi-signal matching, and structured provider outcomes through the official MCP SDK.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct workflow: get_editorial_status checks a single work, check_references evaluates a reference list, and watch_institution scans an entire institution. There is no meaningful overlap between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, check_, watch_), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is lean but focused. The count is slightly low for a broad domain, but each tool addresses a core need (single-work status, reference-list checking, institutional monitoring) without feeling trivial.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the primary workflows for retraction monitoring: checking a work, a reference list, and an institution's flagged/citing papers. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct search across all retracted works), but the core lifecycle is well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues