Skip to main content
Glama
lonexreb

io.github.lonexreb/retractguard

by lonexreb

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.lonexreb/retractguard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.
      3
      16 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to audit academic citation contexts, calculate scientific consensus ratios, and generate credibility badge indexes for verified citations through MCP-compliant tools.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multi-source literature search, full-text retrieval, reference analysis, and journal quality assessment across Europe PMC, PubMed, arXiv, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and EasyScholar via the MCP protocol.
      5
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Checks whether a citation has been retracted, corrected, or flagged with an expression of concern by querying Crossref — including retractions that Crossref backfills from the Retraction Watch database, which publishers often never record in their own metadata. Lets an AI agent verify a DOI, or every DOI in a reference list, before using it in research or writing.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct workflow: get_editorial_status checks a single work, check_references evaluates a reference list, and watch_institution scans an entire institution. There is no meaningful overlap between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, check_, watch_), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is lean but focused. The count is slightly low for a broad domain, but each tool addresses a core need (single-work status, reference-list checking, institutional monitoring) without feeling trivial.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the primary workflows for retraction monitoring: checking a work, a reference list, and an institution's flagged/citing papers. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct search across all retracted works), but the core lifecycle is well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues