io.github.lonexreb/retractguard
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.lonexreb/retractguard
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.316 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for verifying academic citations via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and CrossRef.115 PyPIMIT

genpark-smart-citationofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to audit academic citation contexts, calculate scientific consensus ratios, and generate credibility badge indexes for verified citations through MCP-compliant tools.8-- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables multi-source literature search, full-text retrieval, reference analysis, and journal quality assessment across Europe PMC, PubMed, arXiv, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and EasyScholar via the MCP protocol.511 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks whether a citation has been retracted, corrected, or flagged with an expression of concern by querying Crossref — including retractions that Crossref backfills from the Retraction Watch database, which publishers often never record in their own metadata. Lets an AI agent verify a DOI, or every DOI in a reference list, before using it in research or writing.21MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct workflow: get_editorial_status checks a single work, check_references evaluates a reference list, and watch_institution scans an entire institution. There is no meaningful overlap between them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, check_, watch_), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.
With only 3 tools, the server is lean but focused. The count is slightly low for a broad domain, but each tool addresses a core need (single-work status, reference-list checking, institutional monitoring) without feeling trivial.
The toolset covers the primary workflows for retraction monitoring: checking a work, a reference list, and an institution's flagged/citing papers. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct search across all retracted works), but the core lifecycle is well represented.