remove_watch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Delete' without mentioning whether deletion is permanent, what happens if the name is not found, whether any confirmation or side effects occur, or the scope of 'local'. The term 'local' is ambiguous and not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no filler, front-loaded with the action verb. It conveys the essential purpose without unnecessary words, making it efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While an output schema exists, the description lacks any mention of error handling, behavior on nonexistent watchlists, or confirmation requirements. Given the simplicity of the operation and the presence of an output schema, it is partially complete but leaves important behavioral questions unanswered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must clarify the parameter's purpose. It states 'by name', which identifies the parameter as the watchlist identifier. However, it does not add detail about format, length, or case sensitivity, though for a single simple string parameter this is likely sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states a specific verb 'Delete' and resource 'local watchlist by name', making it distinct from siblings like add_watch, check_watch, and list_watches. The description unambiguously identifies the action without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as add_watch or check_watch. It implies deletion by name but does not specify any prerequisites, contexts, or exclusions. An agent must infer usage solely from the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.