tesla_flash

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states the action without any behavioral context. Since no annotations are provided, it should disclose traits like if flashing is a momentary action, whether it requires the car to be awake, or any side effects, but it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that communicates the purpose efficiently. Every word is necessary, and no information is missing for a tool with no parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (no parameters, no required setup), the description is mostly complete. The presence of an output schema may cover return values, so the lack of detail is acceptable. However, a note about expected behavior (e.g., flash duration) could add value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and the schema is empty. The description adds value by naming the action, but no further parameter semantics are needed. Per guidelines, baseline for zero parameters is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action: 'Flash the headlights.' This is a specific verb and resource, and it clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'tesla_honk' or 'tesla_lock' which perform different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention that flashing headlights might be used for attention or signaling, nor does it compare to 'tesla_honk' for similar purposes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.