Skip to main content
Glama
lmwharton

lmwharton/sieve-mcp

by lmwharton
README.md
[![PyPI version](https://badge.fury.io/py/sieve-mcp.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/sieve-mcp/)
[![Python 3.10+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10+-blue.svg)](https://www.python.org/downloads/)
[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[![MCP Compatible](https://img.shields.io/badge/MCP-Compatible-green.svg)](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)

# Sieve MCP Server — AI-Powered Venture Capital Due Diligence

**The first MCP server purpose-built for venture capital.** Drop a company name into Claude, Cursor, or Windsurf and get a quantified investment memo in 5 minutes — not a ChatGPT summary, a real analyst-grade IMPACT-X assessment with every claim verified against evidence.

> **"Screen a startup called Acme Corp"** → Sieve researches the company, scores it across 7 dimensions, verifies every claim, and tells you: **Take the meeting** or **Pass**.

## Why Sieve?

Most VCs screen 50+ deals a month. Most of those are obvious passes — but you still spend 2-3 hours per deal on basic diligence before you know that. Sieve does that work in 5 minutes.

### What You Get

| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| **Investment Memo** | Full analyst-grade memo with executive summary, key strengths, critical concerns, and actionable recommendation — not a ChatGPT summary |
| **Deal Scoring (0-140)** | Quantified Sieve Score across 7 IMPACT-X dimensions — structured, repeatable, comparable across your portfolio |
| **Red Flag Detection** | Automatically surfaces deal-breakers: founder risk, market timing issues, unsustainable unit economics, missing traction, competitive threats |
| **Evidence Verification** | Every finding tagged as Documented, Discovered, Inferred, or Missing — cross-references pitch deck claims against real-world evidence |
| **Competitive Landscape** | Maps competitors, identifies moat strength, evaluates defensibility and switching costs |
| **Financial Model Assessment** | Evaluates unit economics, pricing power, revenue model viability, and path to profitability |
| **Market Sizing** | TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with timing assessment — is the market ready? |
| **Team Evaluation** | Founder-market fit, team completeness, domain expertise, execution track record |
| **Traction Analysis** | Growth metrics, customer validation, revenue signals, engagement patterns |
| **Real-time Deal Chat** | Ask follow-up questions, challenge findings, explore what-if scenarios, dig into any dimension |
| **Sector-Aware Analysis** | Adapts benchmarks for fintech, healthtech, deeptech, climate, SaaS, consumer, and more |
| **Stage-Calibrated** | Different expectations for pre-seed vs seed vs Series A — doesn't penalize early-stage for missing late-stage metrics |

### What Makes Sieve Different

- **Not a wrapper around ChatGPT.** Sieve runs a structured multi-agent analysis pipeline with real-time web research, evidence verification, and domain-specific benchmarks.
- **We tell you what we don't know.** Every finding is evidence-typed (Documented / Discovered / Inferred / Missing) so you see exactly what's verified and where the gaps are.
- **Repeatable framework.** The same IMPACT-X methodology every time, so you can compare deals apples-to-apples across your portfolio.
- **Built by VCs.** Not a generic AI tool adapted for investing — purpose-built for the way investors actually evaluate deals.

### IMPACT-X Framework

| Dimension | What Sieve evaluates |
|---|---|
| **I** — Innovators | Founding team quality, experience, domain expertise |
| **M** — Market | Opportunity size, timing, tailwinds |
| **P** — Product | Solution strength, differentiation, technical depth |
| **A** — Advantage | Competitive moat, defensibility, switching costs |
| **C** — Commerce | Business model, unit economics, pricing power |
| **T** — Traction | Growth metrics, validation signals, customer evidence |
| **X** — X-Factor | Unique qualities, timing advantages, intangibles |

Each dimension scores 0-20. Total Sieve Score ranges from 0-140.

## Quick Start

### Install

```bash
pip install sieve-mcp
```

Or run directly without installing:

```bash
uvx sieve-mcp
```

### Get Your API Key

1. Sign up free at [app.sieve.arceusxventures.com](https://app.sieve.arceusxventures.com)
2. Go to **Settings** → copy your API key
3. Free tier: 2 screens/month. Pro: unlimited.

### Claude Desktop

Add to your `claude_desktop_config.json`:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sieve": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["sieve-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "SIEVE_API_KEY": "your-api-key"
      }
    }
  }
}
```

### Claude Code

```bash
claude mcp add sieve -- uvx sieve-mcp
export SIEVE_API_KEY="your-api-key"
```

### Cursor / Windsurf

Add to your MCP settings:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sieve": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["sieve-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "SIEVE_API_KEY": "your-api-key"
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Available Tools

| Tool | What it does | Read-only |
|---|---|---|
| `sieve_screen` | Start a Quick Screen — pass a company name, optional website URL, pitch deck text, or description | No |
| `sieve_status` | Poll analysis progress — see which dimensions are complete and current scores | Yes |
| `sieve_summary` | Get the full investment memo — Sieve Score, recommendation, strengths, concerns, evidence | Yes |
| `sieve_usage` | Check how many screens you've used this billing period | Yes |

## Example Workflow

Just talk to your AI assistant naturally:

**1. Screen a startup**
> "Run a Sieve screen on Acme Corp at acme.com"

**2. Check progress** (analysis takes 2-5 minutes)
> "What's the status of that Sieve analysis?"

**3. Get the full investment memo**
> "Show me the Sieve results for Acme Corp"

**4. Explore the deal**
> "What are the red flags? Anything that should kill this deal?"
>
> "How strong is their competitive moat? Who are the main competitors?"
>
> "Walk me through their unit economics — is this business model viable?"
>
> "How does the founding team stack up? Any gaps?"
>
> "What's the market timing like? Is this too early or too late?"
>
> "Compare this deal to the last three I screened"

**5. Check your usage**
> "How many Sieve screens do I have left this month?"

### Pro tip: Upload a pitch deck for deeper analysis

Paste pitch deck text or founder meeting notes for maximum accuracy:

> "Screen Acme Corp — here's their pitch deck text: [paste]. Also check acme.com"

Sieve cross-references every pitch deck claim against real-world evidence. When a founder says "fastest-growing in the category," Sieve checks if that's actually true.

### More things you can ask

| Use case | Example prompt |
|---|---|
| **Quick pass/take meeting** | "Screen this company and give me the bottom line" |
| **Investment memo for IC** | "Generate a full investment memo I can present to my partners" |
| **Red flag check** | "What are the deal-breakers for this startup?" |
| **Competitive analysis** | "Who competes with this company and how defensible are they?" |
| **Financial viability** | "Does their business model make sense? What are the unit economics?" |
| **Team assessment** | "Evaluate the founding team — any gaps or concerns?" |
| **Market validation** | "Is the market real? What's the TAM and timing?" |
| **Batch screening** | "Screen these 5 startups and rank them by Sieve Score" |
| **Follow-up prep** | "Based on this analysis, what questions should I ask the founders?" |
| **Portfolio comparison** | "How does this deal compare to others I've screened?" |

## Who Uses Sieve

- **Solo GPs** screening 50+ deals/month — stop spending hours on obvious passes
- **Angel investors** evaluating startups outside their domain — Sieve brings sector expertise
- **Emerging fund managers** building a repeatable diligence process — consistent framework, every time
- **Accelerators** standardizing evaluation — compare apples to apples across your cohort

## Environment Variables

| Variable | Required | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| `SIEVE_API_KEY` | Yes | — | Your Sieve API key ([get one free](https://app.sieve.arceusxventures.com/settings)) |
| `SIEVE_API_URL` | No | `https://api.sieve.arceusxventures.com` | API base URL |

## Running with Docker

```bash
docker build -t sieve-mcp .
docker run -p 8080:8080 -e SIEVE_API_KEY=your-key sieve-mcp
```

## Development

```bash
# Install locally
pip install -e .

# Run in stdio mode (for MCP clients)
sieve-mcp

# Run in HTTP mode (for remote/container deployment)
sieve-mcp http
```

## Also Available As

Sieve isn't just an MCP server. Use it however fits your workflow:

- **Web App** — [app.sieve.arceusxventures.com](https://app.sieve.arceusxventures.com) — Full experience with real-time deal chat and document upload
- **REST API** — [api.sieve.arceusxventures.com/api/docs](https://api.sieve.arceusxventures.com/api/docs) — Integrate into custom deal flow pipelines
- **Android App** — Screen startups on the go

## Links

- **Website**: [sieve.arceusxventures.com](https://sieve.arceusxventures.com)
- **Web App**: [app.sieve.arceusxventures.com](https://app.sieve.arceusxventures.com)
- **API Docs**: [api.sieve.arceusxventures.com/api/docs](https://api.sieve.arceusxventures.com/api/docs)
- **PyPI**: [pypi.org/project/sieve-mcp](https://pypi.org/project/sieve-mcp/)
- **Contact**: [hello@arceusxventures.com](mailto:hello@arceusxventures.com)

## License

MIT

---

Built by [ArceusX Ventures](https://sieve.arceusxventures.com) — from VCs, for VCs.

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.lmwharton/sieve-mcp -->

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing documents, adding documents, listing deals, running screens, checking status, retrieving results, getting memos, and checking usage. No two tools overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share the 'sieve_' prefix, but naming patterns are mixed: some are plain nouns (e.g., sieve_dataroom, sieve_deals) while others use verb_noun (e.g., sieve_dataroom_add). This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.

Tool Count5/5

With 8 tools, the set covers the full document screening lifecycle without unnecessary duplication. Each tool serves a necessary role, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the primary workflow: add documents, screen, check status, get results, and generate memos. However, it lacks update or delete operations for documents or deals, which could be useful but are not critical for core use.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues