chaoslimba-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to chaoslimba-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for connecting to and interacting with various database systems (SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, SQL Server) through a unified interface.3-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that provides access to Maimemo study data, including vocabulary progress, word lists, and notepads. It supports both stdio and HTTP transports with authentication and rate limiting for secure data access.62 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for SQL databases (SQL Server, Postgres, SQLite) with multi-server support and three-layer safety using AST validation and linting.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA read-only MCP server so AI agents can query the corpus or the live site.21716MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Firebird databases intended for local use. It reads connection details from FlameRobin's fr_databases.conf so no extra configuration is needed — if you have FlameRobin set up with your Firebird databases, this server works out of the box.292MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Large Language Models to interact with and query the classic Northwind database through a REST API.-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Every tool targets a distinct data area or action: schema, grammar maps, prerequisite chains, content, coverage, error patterns, adaptations, reading questions, stress pairs, and various analytics. There is no meaningful overlap among the getters or between getters and the two add tools.
Almost all tools follow the cl_ + verb + noun pattern, e.g., cl_get_content, cl_add_content, cl_get_tts_usage. The single outlier is cl_coverage_report, which omits the get_ verb, causing a minor inconsistency in an otherwise predictable naming convention.
20 tools is on the heavy side and falls in the 16-25 range that feels borderline. However, the tools cover a broad educational analytics domain with distinct read-only queries, so each tool serves a reasonably identifiable purpose.
The read/audit surface is quite comprehensive, covering grammar, content, reading questions, learner behavior, proficiency trends, generated content, and TTS costs. The main gaps are the lack of update/delete operations and write tools for most entities beyond content and reading questions, but that appears intentional for an analytics-and-seeding server.