Skip to main content
Glama
lleontor705

agent-mailbox-mcp

by lleontor705

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-mailbox-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for multi-agent collaboration enabling AI agents to communicate, delegate tasks, and share artifacts across clients and machines with federation support.
      21 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for universal multi-agent communication, enabling agents to register, send/receive messages, manage tasks, and coordinate via role-based routing with project isolation.
      2 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents the ability to discover, match with, and build relationships with other autonomous agents. Supports agent registration, matchmaking, messaging, shared goals, relationship lifecycle management, and real-time event subscriptions.
      16 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a specific action and resource: messaging (send, read, broadcast, search, request, threads, count, activity), A2A tasks (submit, get, list, cancel, respond), resource leases (acquire, release, check), and dead-letter queue management (list, retry, purge). The purposes are clearly distinct and descriptions eliminate ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent prefix-based naming scheme (msg_, a2a_, resource_, dlq_) with verb_object patterns. Minor deviations include 'msg_activity_feed' (noun instead of verb) and 'agent_register' lacking a category prefix, but these are not confusing.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 21 tools, the count is slightly above the typical well-scoped range but appropriate given the server's broad scope covering messaging, A2A tasks, resource coordination, and DLQ management. Each tool contributes to a cohesive set, though a few could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is well-covered with full lifecycles for messaging, A2A tasks, resource leases, and DLQ handling. Minor gaps include no resource listing or message deletion, but these are not critical for the server's purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues