Cortex Hub
Provides integration with OpenAI's API for LLM generation, supporting models like GPT-4.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Cortex Hubsearch my codebase for the function validateToken"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Why Cortex?
Every AI coding agent works in isolation. Switch IDE, switch machine, switch project — the agent starts from zero. Your team's hard-won decisions, bug fixes, and architectural patterns live and die inside individual chat sessions.
Cortex Hub is a self-hosted backend that gives every agent on your team persistent memory, shared knowledge, and cross-project intelligence via a single MCP endpoint:
Claude Code Cursor Antigravity Codex Gemini
│ │ │ │ │
└──────────┴────────────┴───────────┴─────────┘
│
┌───────▼────────┐
│ Cortex Hub │ ← one MCP endpoint for everything
│ │
│ Memory │ Agents remember across sessions
│ Knowledge │ Team shares bug fixes, patterns
│ Code Intel │ Search any project's code by name
│ Quality Gates │ Enforce build/lint before commit
└────────────────┘What this means in practice
New machine, instant context:
You: (fresh laptop, just cloned your project)
> /install ← one command, MCP configured
> /cs ← session starts
Cortex: "Resuming from last session. You were working on JWT rotation
for the auth service. The team decided RS256 with 90-day expiry
(stored by Dev B on March 15). Related: payment service uses
the same pattern — see knowledge doc kdoc-4a2b."
You didn't bring any notes. You didn't clone the other repos.
Cortex remembered everything.Cross-project code search without cloning:
You: "How does the backend handle user auth?"
Agent: cortex_code_search(query: "user auth", repo: "my-backend")
→ validateToken (Function) — src/middleware/auth.ts
→ refreshSession (Function) — src/services/session.ts
You never cloned my-backend. Cortex indexed it server-side
and searched the AST graph across 15 repos in 20ms.Team knowledge that compounds:
Session 1 (Dev A, Claude Code):
Fixed auth bug → stored knowledge: "JWT needs audience claim for mobile"
Session 2 (Dev B, Cursor, different project):
Hit same auth issue → cortex_knowledge_search("JWT mobile") → instant fix
Session 3 (New hire, day 1):
/cs → sees all team decisions, patterns, bug fixes
Productive from hour one, not week three.Retrieval quality: 96.0% R@5 on LongMemEval (500 questions, 6 categories) — matching MemPalace (96.6%) with $0 cost, no API key, fully offline. MemPalace requires paid OpenAI embeddings; Cortex runs the model in-process for free.
Zero data leaves your infrastructure. Self-hosted on a $5/month VPS behind Cloudflare Tunnel. Handles 5+ concurrent agents. Local embedding by default — no API keys, no network, no rate limits.
Related MCP server: agentmako
Features
🧠 Code Intelligence (GitNexus)
Capability | Tool | What It Does |
Multi-project search |
| Omit |
360° symbol context |
| Callers, callees, execution flows for any function/class |
Blast radius |
| See downstream impact before editing |
Pre-commit risk |
| Analyze uncommitted changes, find affected flows |
Direct graph queries |
| Cypher against the AST knowledge graph |
Multi-repo registry |
| All indexed repos discoverable by name or slug |
Auto-reindex |
| Trigger after pushes |
Smart cross-project search (added Apr 2026): call cortex_code_search(query: "...") without specifying repo and Cortex fans out across every indexed repo, runs both flow + symbol search, and returns a ranked list with refine hints. No more list_repos → guess → retry loops.
💾 Hierarchical Memory + Knowledge
Memory (per-agent, semantic recall across sessions):
cortex_memory_store/cortex_memory_searchBranch-scoped, project-scoped, with semantic deduplication
Knowledge Base (team-wide, structured):
cortex_knowledge_store/cortex_knowledge_searchHall types (MemPalace-inspired):
fact,event,discovery,preference,advice,generalTemporal validity:
valid_from/invalidated_at— query "what was true on date X"Supersession chain: mark old facts as replaced by new ones
Timeline view:
GET /api/knowledge/timeline— chronological exploration
// Store a fact with validity window
cortex_knowledge_store({
title: "JWT secret rotation policy",
content: "Rotate every 90 days, ...",
hallType: "fact",
validFrom: "2026-01-01"
})
// Later, when policy changes:
POST /api/knowledge/{id}/invalidate
body: { supersededBy: "new-doc-id" }🍳 Recipe System (Auto-Learning)
Inspired by HKUDS/OpenSpace — Cortex captures patterns from completed work automatically:
Auto-capture on
task.completeandsession_end— if execution log shows a non-trivial workflow, an LLM extracts it as a reusable recipeQuality metrics:
selection_count,applied_count,completion_count,fallback_countper docHybrid search ranking:
vector_similarity * 0.6 + effective_rate * 0.3 + recency * 0.1(only whenselection_count >= 3)Evolution: docs with
fallback_rate > 0.4flagged for LLM rewrite via/health-checkLineage DAG: parent → derived → fixed relationships tracked
Dashboard /knowledge page shows the Recipe Health Panel — capture pipeline status, quality distribution, origin breakdown (manual/captured/derived/fixed), recent capture log.
🔀 LLM Gateway (CLIProxy)
Multi-provider: Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic, any OpenAI-compatible
Ordered fallback chains with automatic retry (429/502/503/504)
Format translation (Gemini ↔ OpenAI) handled transparently
Budget enforcement — daily/monthly token limits from Dashboard
Complexity-based routing —
model: "auto"selects tier based on task
🛡️ Quality Gates
4-dimension scoring after every session:
Dimension | Weight | Measures |
Build | 25 | Code compiles |
Regression | 25 | No existing tests broken |
Standards | 25 | Follows conventions |
Traceability | 25 | Changes linked to requirements |
Plus plan quality (cortex_plan_quality) — 8-criterion plan assessment before execution.
🔒 Compliance Enforcement
Session compliance score — graded A/B/C/D at session end across 5 categories (Discovery, Safety, Learning, Contribution, Lifecycle)
Adaptive hints — every MCP response includes context-aware suggestions
Hook-enforced workflow —
/csblocks edits until knowledge + memory recall calledPre-commit gates — git commits blocked until quality gates pass
📊 Dashboard (13 pages)
Overview — hero stats + per-project cards + recipe health
Sessions — agent session list with API key tracking
Quality — A→F grades with trend charts
Knowledge — browse + Recipe Health Panel + capture log
Projects — repo management with branch-aware indexing
Providers / Usage / Keys / Organizations / Settings — full admin
Mobile-responsive, dark theme
Benchmarks
Reproducible retrieval benchmarks against industry-standard datasets.
LongMemEval-S full 500 questions
Cortex Hub | MemPalace | |
R@5 | 96.0% | 96.6% |
R@10 | 97.8% | 98.2% |
NDCG@10 | 1.44 | 0.889 |
Embedding | Local (in-process, free) | OpenAI API (paid) |
API key needed | No | Yes |
Embedding speed | ~10ms/text | ~600ms/text |
Search (500 queries) | 52.6s | ~5 min |
Cost per run | $0 | ~$2-5 |
Cortex matches MemPalace within 0.6 points on R@5 — while being free, offline, and 60x faster per embedding. NDCG@10 is 62% higher: when Cortex finds the answer, it places it at #1, not just somewhere in top 5.
MemPalace requires a paid OpenAI API key for embeddings. Cortex embeds through a local Ollama container — zero external network, zero cost, zero rate limits. The figures above were measured with the in-process Xenova/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embedder that shipped at the time; see the note below.
# Run benchmark (no API key needed)
pnpm --filter @cortex/benchmarks bench:longmemeval
# Cleanup test data
pnpm --filter @cortex/benchmarks bench:longmemeval --cleanupSee benchmarks/README.md for full methodology, per-category breakdown, and results log.
Embedding Provider
Cortex supports two interchangeable embedding backends:
Every embedding goes through the internal LLM gateway (/api/llm/v1/embeddings),
which resolves the provider from the model_routing table at request time. Point
it at whichever backend you prefer from Settings → Providers:
Provider | Model | Dim | Median / p90 per text | Cost |
|
| 384 | 27ms / 64ms | Free |
|
| 1024 | 500ms / 638ms | Free |
|
| 768 | ~600ms via API | $$ |
The stack ships an ollama container with no host port, so local embedding needs
no API key and never leaves the compose network.
Measured on this repo's own index (1256 chunks of real source, 8 queries with a
known answer file, 12 CPU cores, no GPU) — run pnpm bench:rerank in
benchmarks/ to reproduce:
Model | Index 1256 chunks | recall@1 | recall@3 | recall@5 | MRR |
| 43s | 2/8 | 3/8 | 6/8 | 0.400 |
| 662s (15x) | 4/8 | 5/8 | 6/8 | 0.594 |
Read that as a ranking problem, not a retrieval problem: both models put the
right file in the top 5 equally often, and bge-m3 only buys a better order
for 15x the indexing cost. Pick all-minilm when a caller reads several hits,
bge-m3 when it reads only the first — or keep all-minilm and fix the order
with a reranker, below.
Reranking (optional)
Set TYPESAFE_API_KEY and /api/intel/code-search over-fetches vector
candidates and reorders them by asking TypeSafe Jev (POST api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone)
whether each one actually contains what the query asked for — a typed yes/no with
a calibrated probability, not a chat completion to parse. With no key the search
path is byte-for-byte what it is today, and if a rerank call fails the candidate
keeps its vector score, so an outage degrades to the current ordering rather than
breaking search.
Note: an earlier release ran
Xenova/all-MiniLM-L6-v2in-process via@huggingface/transformers, selected withEMBEDDING_PROVIDER=local. That code was removed in1fbfafcin favour of the gateway. BothEMBEDDING_PROVIDERandLOCAL_EMBEDDING_MODELare now ignored — set the provider in the dashboard instead.
Architecture
graph TB
subgraph Agents["AI Agents (any MCP client)"]
AG["Antigravity"]
CC["Claude Code"]
CU["Cursor"]
WS["Windsurf"]
CX["Codex"]
end
subgraph Gateway["Hub MCP Server"]
AUTH["API Key Auth"]
ROUTER["Tool Router (25 tools)"]
TEL["Telemetry + Hints Engine"]
end
subgraph Services["Backend Services (Docker)"]
direction LR
GN["GitNexus<br/>AST Graph :4848"]
QD["Qdrant<br/>Vectors :6333"]
DB["SQLite<br/>WAL Mode"]
CLIP["CLIProxy<br/>LLM Gateway :8317"]
end
subgraph Frontend["Dashboard"]
DASH["Next.js 15<br/>(13 pages, static export)"]
end
Agents --> AUTH --> ROUTER --> TEL
TEL --> Services
DASH --> DBNetwork Topology
Internet
├── localhost:8318 ─────────── Hub MCP Server
└── localhost:3000 ─────────── Dashboard UI
│
Cloudflare Tunnel
│
┌─────────┼─────────┐
│ Docker Compose │
│ ├─ dashboard-web │ Nginx (UI + API proxy)
│ ├─ cortex-api │ Internal API + mem9
│ ├─ cortex-mcp │ 18+ MCP tools
│ ├─ qdrant │ vectors + knowledge
│ ├─ gitnexus │ AST code graph
│ ├─ llm-proxy │ CLIProxy
│ └─ watchtower │ auto-update
└────────────────────┘
Zero open ports on host.MCP Tools
Cortex exposes 24 tools via a single MCP endpoint:
# | Tool | Purpose |
1 |
| Start session, get project context + relevant knowledge |
2 |
| Close session with compliance grade |
3 |
| Check unseen changes from other agents |
4 |
| Multi-project AST/symbol search with smart fan-out |
5 |
| 360° symbol view |
6 |
| Blast radius analysis |
7 |
| Trigger re-indexing |
8 |
| List indexed repos with names + slugs |
9 |
| Direct graph queries |
10 |
| Pre-commit risk analysis |
11 |
| Recall agent memories |
12 |
| Store findings |
13 |
| Search knowledge base (with hall_type + asOf filters) |
14 |
| Store knowledge with hall type + validity |
15 |
| Report build/test/lint results |
16 |
| 8-criterion plan assessment |
17 |
| Token savings + tool usage analytics |
18 |
| Backend service health check |
Cross-project search just works — no repo lookup needed:
cortex_code_search(query: "auth middleware jwt") // scans ALL projects
cortex_code_search(query: "auth middleware jwt", repo: "cortex-hub") // narrow to oneFull API reference:
docs/api/hub-mcp-reference.md
Quick Start
Run Agent (No Clone Needed)
# macOS / Linux — interactive wizard
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lktiep/cortex-hub/master/scripts/run-agent.sh | bash -s -- launch
# Headless daemon with preset
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lktiep/cortex-hub/master/scripts/run-agent.sh | bash -s -- start --daemon --preset fullstack# Windows
iwr -useb "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lktiep/cortex-hub/master/scripts/run-agent.ps1" -OutFile $env:TEMP\run-agent.ps1
& $env:TEMP\run-agent.ps1 startOne-Command Project Setup
# macOS / Linux
curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lktiep/cortex-hub/master/scripts/install.sh" | bash
# Windows
iwr -useb "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lktiep/cortex-hub/master/scripts/install.ps1" -OutFile $env:TEMP\install.ps1; & $env:TEMP\install.ps1Or inside Claude Code: type /install
The installer:
Auto-detects IDEs (Claude, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Codex)
Configures MCP for each
Installs enforcement hooks (
.claude/hooks/*)Creates project profile with stack detection
Auto-adds
.gitignoreentries for generated filesIdempotent — safe to re-run
Server Setup (Admin)
# Clone from your self-hosted server (or wherever you keep the repo)
git clone <your-cortex-hub-repo-url>
cd cortex-hub
corepack enable && pnpm install
cp .env.example .env # add API keys
cd infra && docker compose up -dMulti-Agent Conductor
Cortex includes an experimental multi-agent orchestration layer for cross-IDE task delegation. It is not feature-complete — agents can already create/pickup tasks, but autonomous strategy execution and smart agent matching are still WIP.
📖 See docs/conductor.md for current capabilities, limitations, and the rough edges to expect.
Tech Stack
Layer | Technology | Role |
MCP Server | Hono on Node.js | Streamable HTTP + JSON-RPC, 25 tools |
Code Intel | GitNexus | AST parsing, execution flow, Cypher graph |
Embeddings | mem9 + Qdrant | Vector search with semantic recall |
LLM Proxy | CLIProxy | Multi-provider with fallback chains |
App DB | SQLite (WAL) | Sessions, quality, usage, knowledge metadata |
API | Hono | Dashboard backend + mem9 in-process |
Frontend | Next.js 15 + React 19 | Static export, served by nginx |
Infra | Docker Compose | Service orchestration |
Tunnel | Cloudflare Tunnel | Zero open ports |
Hooks | Lefthook | Stack-aware git hooks |
Monorepo | pnpm + Turborepo | Build orchestration |
Project Structure
cortex-hub/
├── apps/
│ ├── hub-mcp/ # MCP Server — 25 tools
│ ├── dashboard-api/ # Hono API + mem9 + recipe pipeline
│ └── dashboard-web/ # Next.js dashboard (13 pages)
├── packages/
│ ├── shared-types/ # TS type definitions
│ ├── shared-utils/ # Logger, common utilities
│ └── shared-mem9/ # Embedding pipeline + vector store
├── benchmarks/ # Reproducible benchmarks (LongMemEval, etc.)
├── infra/
│ ├── docker-compose.yml # Full stack
│ └── Dockerfile.* # Per-service builds
├── scripts/
│ ├── install.sh / .ps1 # Unified installer
│ ├── run-agent.sh / .ps1 # Agent daemon launcher
│ └── bootstrap.sh # Admin setup
├── docs/
│ ├── architecture/ # Design docs (recipe, conductor, gateway)
│ ├── conductor.md # ⚠️ Multi-agent orchestration (experimental)
│ └── guides/ # Onboarding, installation, use cases
├── templates/
│ ├── skills/install/ # /install slash command
│ └── workflows/ # Workflow templates (/code, /continue)
└── .cortex/ # Project profile + agent identityDocs
Document | Description |
System architecture with diagrams | |
Recipe System (auto-learning from execution) | |
LLM Gateway design | |
Quality gates + scoring | |
Multi-agent conductor (experimental) | |
Full MCP tool API reference | |
Benchmark methodology + results | |
Full installation guide | |
Use cases + system requirements | |
Free LLM Provider Setup & Dynamic Routing Guide |
Real-World Scenarios
Solo dev, multiple projects
You maintain 5 repos across 3 languages. You fix a deployment bug in project A. Next week, project B has the same issue. Without Cortex, you debug from scratch. With Cortex:
cortex_knowledge_search("docker nginx 502 after restart")
→ "Nginx caches DNS at startup. Fix: resolver 127.0.0.11 valid=5s"
(stored 6 days ago by you, in project A)Time saved: 30 min per known bug. Across 5 projects, that's hours/week.
Team of 3, shared codebase
Dev A refactors the auth middleware on Monday. Dev B starts a feature on Wednesday using the old auth pattern. Without Cortex, B's code breaks and nobody knows why. With Cortex:
/cs → "Dev A refactored auth middleware on Monday. New pattern uses
middleware.authenticate() instead of req.checkAuth(). See
knowledge doc kdoc-8f2a for migration steps."Zero "who changed this?" conversations. Zero broken PRs from stale patterns.
Onboarding a new team member
Day 1. New hire clones the repo. Runs /install. Opens Claude Code.
/cs → Cortex loads:
- 47 team knowledge docs (deployment patterns, API conventions, known gotchas)
- Recent session summaries (what's being worked on NOW)
- Code intelligence across all indexed repos
New hire: "How does the payment flow work?"
cortex_code_search(query: "payment flow checkout")
→ 3 projects with relevant code, ranked by relevance, with file pathsProductive on day 1, not week 3. No "ask Dave, he knows how it works."
Switching machines mid-task
Working on your Mac at the office. Continue on Windows VPS at home.
Same API key → same memory → same knowledge → same session context.
/cs resumes exactly where you left off.
No git stash, no notes, no "what was I doing?"Multi-IDE workflow
Debug in Claude Code (deep reasoning). UI work in Cursor (fast iteration). Code review in Antigravity (visual). All three share the same Cortex backend:
Claude Code: stores finding → "Race condition in WebSocket reconnect"
Cursor: picks up finding → applies fix in the UI component
Antigravity: reviews the fix → stores quality feedbackEvery agent builds on what the others learned. No repeated explanations.
System Requirements
Resource | Minimum | Recommended | Notes |
CPU | 2 vCPU | 4 vCPU | Qdrant vector search is CPU-bound |
RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB | Qdrant + GitNexus + Node services |
Disk | 20 GB | 50 GB | Vector indices grow with knowledge |
OS | Ubuntu 22.04+ | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS | Any Linux with Docker 24+ |
Best value: Hetzner CX22 (~$4.50/mo) handles 3-5 agents.
Cost
Component | Cost | Notes |
Linux server | $4.50/mo+ | Hetzner CX22 minimum |
Cloudflare Tunnel | Free | No open ports |
All services | Free | Self-hosted in Docker |
LLM API calls | Pay-per-use | Your own keys, budget-controlled |
Total | ~$5/mo + LLM usage |
Contributing
See Contributing Guide for development setup, commit conventions, and code standards.
License
MIT © Cortex Hub Contributors
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
- memnodeOAuthdev.memnode
Persistent, inspectable memory for AI agents with lineage, correction, and a hosted MCP endpoint.
Hosted MCP memory for coding agents: persistent across sessions, editable markdown, team sharing.
Cloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.
shared AI-context layer for teams — persistent memory your agents search and update over MCP
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted memory and governance layer for AI coding agents. 28 MCP tools with hybrid search, structured knowledge capture, behavioral nudges, and git-native storage. Zero cloud dependencies.306Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first codebase intelligence engine providing AI coding agents with a typed MCP toolset for understanding and navigating code repositories.10052Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA self-hosted persistent memory platform for AI agents and humans offering tools for memory storage, search, beliefs, work management, and code intelligence via MCP.7GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server that gives coding agents persistent, code-aware memory with structural graph recall and blast-radius planning. It links experiential decisions to code locations and provides honest measurement instruments.Apache 2.0