Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Lizard MCP

  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables deploying and managing infrastructure via natural language, including project/domain management, compute nodes, image deployment, and CI/CD integration.
    70
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables managing Sliplane deployments, projects, and application status through natural language, with OAuth or API key auth.
    MIT

Related Servers

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 56 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tool purposes are mostly distinct, with clear resource/action prefixes such as service_pause vs project_pause vs workspace_pause, and deploy_redeploy vs deploy_restart. A few boundaries are softer — service_set vs service_scale vs service_set_port/config_apply, billing_status vs billing_summary, and sandbox_exec vs ssh_exec — but the detailed descriptions help differentiate them.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names consistently use snake_case and a resource_action pattern, making the set predictable. Minor deviations like whoami, billing_summary/billing_status, and service_sleep_status/service_sleep_set break the verb-action pattern slightly but remain readable and coherent.

Tool Count2/5

56 tools is excessive for a single MCP server; many granular operations (service_get_port, service_set_port, service_sleep_status, service_sleep_set) could be folded into broader tools. While the platform is broad, the count far exceeds typical coherence thresholds (3–15) and makes discovery and selection costly.

Completeness4/5

Core lifecycle coverage is strong for services, secrets, domains, deploys, sandboxes, and templates, with config_apply filling bulk-operation gaps. Minor gaps remain — e.g., no workspace_delete, no explicit volume_create/delete/attach, and limited addon-specific update tools — but agents can likely work around them.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive