Skip to main content
Glama
liyexiaoyi

mnemosis-mcp

by liyexiaoyi

Related Servers

Alternatives to mnemosis-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid retrieval and brain-inspired namespaces. Enables agents to save, search, and manage memories directly via MCP tools.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent local memory management, including semantic recall, knowledge graph traversal, and automatic memory consolidation, enabling structured long-term memory across MCP clients.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, human-like memory infrastructure via MCP, enabling them to store, search, summarize, and forget episodic, semantic, procedural, and working memories across sessions.
      1,186 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a single self-hosted memory service that any AI assistant can write to and recall from over MCP or REST, storing episodic, semantic, procedural, reflective and session memories in one shared store. Enables agents to remember events as they happen and receive a ranked, token-budgeted brief of relevant history, counts, lessons and procedures before they act.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents persistent memory with semantic search, automatic extraction, and memory decay, accessible via MCP protocol.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents and teams with self-hosted adaptive memory, combining hybrid search and a self-improving neural memory graph to enable precise recall and serendipitous discovery across MCP-compatible clients.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 98 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    With 98 tools, many share overlapping responsibilities (e.g., practice_report/practice_session/practice_due/practice_answer; memory_status/memory_audit/memory_health/memory_map/stats; sleep/sleep_replay/sleep_and_plan; plan/replan/plan_rewrite/plan_quality/plan_tracker). An agent selecting a tool will frequently need to parse subtle description differences, and several report tools seem to summarize the same underlying state.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly use snake_case and many follow verb_noun, but there are many noun-phrase names (memory_health, schema_report, lifecycle_audit, dependency_map, concept_cover) and one-word commands (sleep, check, update, plan, search). This is a readable convention but not consistently predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    98 tools is extreme for any MCP server. Even if each tool has a cognitive justification, this scale makes the tool set hard to navigate and causes selection latency, so it is not well-scoped.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full memory lifecycle—store, retrieve, update, forget, restore, batch review, spaced repetition, sleep consolidation, intentions, planning, reasoning, exports, and audits. There are no obvious dead ends; every major operation appears to have at least one tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues