hermes-local-agent-lanes
Related Servers
Alternatives to hermes-local-agent-lanes
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a secure MCP boundary for AI agents, intercepting and validating tool calls, redacting secrets, and requiring human approval for sensitive actions with a tamper-evident audit trail.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA safe, allowlisted MCP server that lets AI agents run only a tiny set of harmless tools (echo, datetime, hash, dig, GET-only curl, whois, status checks) against explicitly allowed hosts, with sanitization, rate limiting, timeouts, and full audit logging.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that sits between coding agents and local tools, using a tiny on-device model to route tool calls and requiring confirmations for destructive actions, while only exposing four tools to the host.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely discover, invoke, and manage tools through a hardened MCP endpoint with protections like injection detection, circuit breakers, retry backoff, response caching, context-window limiting, and state snapshots.5 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP tool calls with strict schema validation and stdio isolation, while providing a security gateway for tool-level authorization, streaming PII redaction, and model failover routing.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes MCP tools that enable remote LLMs to query local Docker containers, OS processes, and system services in real time.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinct: one is for querying a local model with restrictions, the other is a health check for endpoint connectivity. No overlap in purpose.
Both tools share the prefix 'local_support', creating a consistent pattern. The health tool appends '_health', which is predictable but not a strict verb_noun structure.
With only two tools, the surface is minimal. While a focused health-check server might justify this count, the support tool covers broad tasks, suggesting additional tools (e.g., configuration) could be expected.
The set provides a basic query interface and health check, covering primary needs. However, missing tools for configuration, model listing, or error handling leaves notable gaps for a local model server.