spatial-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to spatial-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and manage GeoNode resources via natural language, including metadata editing, permission changes, uploads, and ownership transfers, all under the acting user's own permissions.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage a GBIF IPT from resource creation to publication, including metadata editing, data validation, Darwin Core mapping, and publishing, through plain language requests.32Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Zuar Portal instances, including authoring HTML blocks, building pages, managing data sources, queries, themes, and users, with versioned and revertible changes.40MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and visualize ArcGIS Online/Enterprise geospatial data through natural language, performing spatial analysis and map generation.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with a GeoServer instance for managing workspaces, datastores, feature types, layers, styles, and OGC services (WMS/WFS) via an LLM-powered agent.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Deriva catalogs and execute ML workflows, including dataset versioning, controlled vocabularies, and feature management.100Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools pair a distinct spatial resource with a distinct action, so list/get/update/delete and task/admin operations are generally easy to tell apart. The main confusion risk is spatial_add_layer versus spatial_create_layer/spatial_create_field, plus spatial_list_objects versus spatial_search_gazetteer, but the descriptions largely clarify these boundaries.
The dominant spatial_verb_noun pattern is consistent and lower_snake_case is used throughout. The un-prefixed inspect_layer_zip and a few noun-only names such as spatial_health, spatial_layer_admin, and spatial_form_contract deviate from the otherwise verb-first convention.
With 31 tools, this is a large surface that exceeds the 25+ threshold for a heavy toolset. Many tools are individually justified by the spatial-service admin lifecycle, but composite operations like spatial_add_layer and overlapping workflow tools make the set feel larger than necessary.
The toolset covers the full layer and field lifecycle: inspect, upload, create, update, verify, delete, task management, remote comparison/import, and user areas. There are no obvious dead ends, and both admin and user-facing workflows appear well supported.