No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 20 tools
Several tools overlap in scope: wb_todo, wb_todo_done/edit/tag/del, and wb_add/wb_manage all cover todo creation/editing, while wb_dev_task duplicates wb_dev_task_create/stage/item. The read-only domains (wb_query, wb_vault, wb_archive) are clear, but the write-side boundaries are fuzzy enough to cause misselection.
Most specific operations follow wb_<domain>_<action> (wb_todo_edit, wb_note_add), and the wb_ prefix is consistent. However, broad domain tools use bare nouns (wb_todo, wb_fin, wb_vault) and some tools use verb-first or abbreviated forms (wb_query, wb_add, wb_manage, wb_del), creating a mixed convention.
At 20 tools, the server is at the high end of acceptable and feels heavy because many tools duplicate functionality covered by broader domain tools. A leaner set could drop or merge the generic wb_add/wb_manage with the specific add/done tools, but the count is not extreme.
Core workflows are covered: todo CRUD, note add/edit, schedule creation, idea capture, dev-task pipeline stages, and read-only vault/archive access. Minor gaps exist (no explicit note delete or dedicated schedule update/delete tool, finance operations hidden behind wb_fin), but agents can work around them.