Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wb-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to invoke CLI-driven agent tools over Streamable HTTP, including shell execution, file operations, patching, image viewing, web search, and nested agent tasks, with permission modes and real-time progress streaming.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode to delegate tasks to the WorkBuddy CLI as a sub-agent via an MCP tool, with one-command setup and configurable model/permission options.
      1
      212 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT, Claude, and other web MCP clients to access and operate multiple VS Code workspaces through tools such as read, bash, edit, write, and workspace_info, with per-workspace tokens and role-based permissions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to expose temporal architectural memory, privacy sanitization, and local test-runner capabilities as MCP tools so clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Hermes Agent can query decisions, sanitize prompts, and verify code changes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables remote MCP client connections with WorkOS AuthKit authentication and organization-based permission controls. Demonstrates permission-gated tool access, such as image generation tools restricted by user permissions.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools overlap in scope: wb_todo, wb_todo_done/edit/tag/del, and wb_add/wb_manage all cover todo creation/editing, while wb_dev_task duplicates wb_dev_task_create/stage/item. The read-only domains (wb_query, wb_vault, wb_archive) are clear, but the write-side boundaries are fuzzy enough to cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most specific operations follow wb_<domain>_<action> (wb_todo_edit, wb_note_add), and the wb_ prefix is consistent. However, broad domain tools use bare nouns (wb_todo, wb_fin, wb_vault) and some tools use verb-first or abbreviated forms (wb_query, wb_add, wb_manage, wb_del), creating a mixed convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, the server is at the high end of acceptable and feels heavy because many tools duplicate functionality covered by broader domain tools. A leaner set could drop or merge the generic wb_add/wb_manage with the specific add/done tools, but the count is not extreme.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are covered: todo CRUD, note add/edit, schedule creation, idea capture, dev-task pipeline stages, and read-only vault/archive access. Minor gaps exist (no explicit note delete or dedicated schedule update/delete tool, finance operations hidden behind wb_fin), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues