decode-base64
Decode Base64 strings to readable text. Provide an encoded string to retrieve the original content.
Instructions
Decode a Base64 string to text.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| encoded | Yes | Base64 string |
Decode Base64 strings to readable text. Provide an encoded string to retrieve the original content.
Decode a Base64 string to text.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| encoded | Yes | Base64 string |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description states the basic operation but omits behavior like expected output format, error handling, or edge cases (e.g., invalid Base64).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no unnecessary words. Front-loaded and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter, no output schema. Description is sufficient for basic use but could mention output type (plain text) or encoding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% but the description adds no meaning beyond the schema's 'Base64 string' label. Acceptable but not enhanced.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Decode') and resource ('Base64 string to text'), distinguishing it from siblings like encode-base64.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., decode-jwt or other decoding tools). No mention of context or restrictions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lisamaraventano-spine/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server