remove_feed
Delete an RSS feed by specifying its name to manage your subscriptions.
Instructions
Remove an RSS feed by name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Name of the feed to remove |
Delete an RSS feed by specifying its name to manage your subscriptions.
Remove an RSS feed by name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Name of the feed to remove |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. 'Remove' implies a destructive operation, but no details on permanence, side effects, or required permissions are given.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. However, could be structured with more details (e.g., bullet points) without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema or return value description. The tool performs a destructive action but lacks information about success confirmation or error scenarios.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (parameter with description), so baseline is 3. The description adds 'by name' but does not provide additional semantic value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Remove' and the resource 'RSS feed', and specifies the identifier 'by name'. It distinguishes well from sibling tools like 'add_feed' and 'list_feeds'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, e.g., listing feeds first or confirming deletion. The description lacks preconditions or postconditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lionkiii/rss-mcp-marketing'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server