gha-doctor
Related Servers
Alternatives to gha-doctor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal-only GitHub Actions and CI maintenance scanner for AI-built apps. Exposes scan, explanation, and fix-planning tools to MCP clients; modifies nothing and makes no outbound requests by default.335 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that analyzes GitHub Actions workflow performance, audits configuration for optimization, and provides billing and cache usage insights.316 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverned CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.28MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMonitors and analyzes GitHub repository health by detecting stale branches, old pull requests, unresponsive issues, and security alerts. Integrates with MCP-compatible AI assistants and automation tools.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides tools to analyze and debug GitHub Actions CI failures, including summarizing failures, detecting flaky tests, and suggesting fixes.105 npm1ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAnalyze GitHub repositories into structured JSON with tech stack detection, dependency analysis, health signals, and security checks. No AI, fully deterministic. Available as CLI and MCP server.9MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct scope: run_deep_dive for a single run, pr_deep_dive for a PR's CI, analyze_repo for whole-repo health, lint_repo for static linting, explain_rule for rule docs, org_overview for fleet triage, and preview_fixes for diffs. Though pr_deep_dive includes a deep-dive component, its PR-level purpose is clearly separated, and all descriptions are explicit about boundaries.
Names are consistently snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_repo, explain_rule, lint_repo, preview_fixes). The exception is the two 'deep_dive' suffixes in run_deep_dive and pr_deep_dive, plus org_overview being noun_noun, but these are minor deviations within an otherwise readable and predictable naming scheme.
7 tools is well-scoped for a CI analysis server. Each tool covers a meaningful slice of the domain (org, repo, PR, run, lint, rule, fix), and none feel redundant or unnecessary.
The tool surface covers the full analysis lifecycle: org-level triage, repo health, PR diagnosis, single-run deep dives, static linting, rule explanation, and previewing fixes. There are no obvious dead ends, and the described workflows (e.g., 'why is my PR slow/failing' → pr_deep_dive) are fully supported.