Skip to main content
Glama

Create a Flarum resource

flarum_create

Create a Flarum resource (e.g., discussions, posts) by specifying type and attributes via JSON:API. Requires an API key with permission.

Instructions

Create any Flarum resource via JSON:API. Provide the resource type, its attributes, and optional relationships. Requires an API key whose user has permission. Example: type="discussions", attributes={ title, content }, relationships={ tags: { data: [{ type: "tags", id: "1" }] } }.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYesResource type, e.g. "discussions", "posts".
attributesYesResource attributes.
relationshipsNoJSON:API relationships object.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the JSON:API format and permission requirement, but does not detail side effects, return values, error handling, or behavior on resource creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences plus an example, front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence adds value, though the example could be integrated more concisely.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a creation tool with 3 parameters and no output schema. Covers resource type, attributes, relationships, and permission, but missing details on response format and error states.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds an example for relationships and clarifies the structure of attributes, but does not provide additional semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'any Flarum resource via JSON:API', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like flarum_create_discussion. The example solidifies the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the requirement for an API key with permission, but provides no guidance on when to use this general tool versus the specialized sibling flarum_create_discussion, nor any conditions or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/linkrobins/mcp-for-flarum'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server