getVisitsForPatient
Retrieve all visits associated with a patient record to track clinic visits and encounters.
Instructions
Get visits for a patient
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| patient | No |
Retrieve all visits associated with a patient record to track clinic visits and encounters.
Get visits for a patient
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| patient | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, side effects, required permissions). The description fails to compensate for the lack of annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (one phrase), which is good for length, but it lacks structure and substance. It is more under-specified than efficiently concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and parameter descriptions, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, expected behavior, or prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'patient' is not described beyond the schema type. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should clarify what value to provide (e.g., patient ID, UUID), but it does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get visits for a patient', which is a specific verb+resource combination. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'findEncounters' or 'manageVisits', and it is unclear whether the tool fetches visits for a specific patient or all patients when the parameter is omitted.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'findEncounters' or 'manageVisits'. No explicit when/when-not conditions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lingeswaranTW/bahmni-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server