Skip to main content
Glama
lindsaysperring

BibleMCP

by lindsaysperring
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to BibleMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bible-mcp

      stackpwnies
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to look up Bible verses, search across translations, and compare different versions locally without API keys.
      -

    • Bible MCP Server

      geosp
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to retrieve Bible passages from multiple translations (ESV, NIV, KJV, NASB, NKJV, NLT, AMP, MSG). Supports querying single or multiple passages and provides both MCP protocol integration and REST API endpoints.
      1
      9
      -

    • SolaGuard MCP Server

      jissac
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive Biblical research tools including scripture lookup, interlinear Greek/Hebrew data, and Strong's concordance within a Protestant theological framework. It enables AI applications to perform full-text biblical searches, topical studies, and cross-referencing using authoritative theological data.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct purpose: browsing translations, listing books, retrieving a specific passage, or fetching a full chapter. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_bibles, list_books, get_passage, get_chapter), making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the server feels well-scoped for its purpose. While minimal, it covers browsing and reading operations without unnecessary bloat. One or two additional tools (e.g., search) could be expected but not required.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic lookup workflows (list translations, list books, retrieve passages/chapters), but lacks search, cross-reference, or note capabilities. Users can successfully read verses but may encounter dead ends for discovery beyond hierarchical listing.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources