Skip to main content
Glama
limowan

mowan-mcp-feedback

by limowan

Related Servers

Alternatives to mowan-mcp-feedback

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A feedback-oriented MCP server with a Web UI for AI development workflows, enabling interactive confirmations and reducing speculative tool calls.
      2
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables human-in-the-loop workflow in AI-assisted development tools by allowing users to provide direct feedback to AI agents without consuming additional premium requests.
      1
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      48 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables users to review and refine AI outputs through a local web UI, returning feedback as free tool call results to save on GitHub Copilot premium requests. It allows for multiple rounds of iterative improvements within a single request session.
      1
      30
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are completely unrelated in purpose, so there is no ambiguity or overlap between them. An agent can easily distinguish interactive_feedback from get_system_info.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming pattern is inconsistent: 'interactive_feedback' uses an adjective-noun format while 'get_system_info' uses a verb-noun format. This mixes conventions and makes the tool names less predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels sparse and underdeveloped. The inclusion of an unrelated system info tool further dilutes the focus, making the count seem poorly scoped for a feedback-focused server.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain appears to be feedback collection, but the surface is incomplete: only interactive feedback is supported, with no way to programmatically list, retrieve, or manage feedback. The system info tool is off-topic and does not fill any obvious gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues