x402-repohealth-mcp
Provides tools for computing a health score for GitHub repositories, analyzing commit activity, issue responsiveness, and release cadence from live GitHub data.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@x402-repohealth-mcpHow healthy is facebook/react?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
x402-repohealth-mcp
A free MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that computes a GitHub repo maintenance/abandonment health score from live GitHub data: is a repo actively maintained, slowing down, likely abandoned, or archived? No API key, no payment, no rate-limit games — just an MCP tool any MCP client can call.
This is the open funnel twin of a paid, x402-gated HTTP API:
x402-repohealth-poc.theliminalguy.workers.dev
— GET /repo-health/:owner/:repo, $0.01 USDC on Base per call via the
x402 payment protocol, for production/high-volume or
non-MCP (plain HTTP) / agent-automated use. Same scoring logic, same
output, just billed per call instead of free-via-MCP.
Why this exists
Agents that pick dependencies, tools, or libraries need to know whether a repo is safe to depend on — actively maintained vs. slowing down vs. effectively dead — and GitHub's own API only gives raw signals (commits, issues, releases), not the decision computed from them. This MCP server is the free/local half of filling that gap — try it for nothing via MCP; reach for the paid HTTP endpoint when you need it at volume or outside an MCP client.
Related MCP server: gts-repo-guardian
What it does
One tool, check_repo_health, takes a GitHub owner + repo and computes
a 0-100 health score across four weighted dimensions (commit recency,
commit activity, issue/PR responsiveness, release cadence, each 0-25
points), plus a verdict:
archived— GitHub's ownarchivedflag is true (overrides the score)actively maintained— score >= 75slowing down— score 45-74likely abandoned— score < 45
The response includes the full score breakdown, computed metrics (days
since last commit, commits in last 90 days, issue close ratio, etc.), and a
human-readable reasoning array built from the actual numbers — nothing is
hardcoded per-repo, it's fetched from GitHub's real public REST API and
scored at call time.
Install & run
npx x402-repohealth-mcpOr add it to an MCP client config (e.g. Claude Desktop's
claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"repohealth": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "x402-repohealth-mcp"]
}
}
}Tool: check_repo_health
Input:
{
"owner": "facebook",
"repo": "react"
}Output (MCP tool text content, JSON-stringified):
{
"owner": "facebook",
"repo": "react",
"fetchedAt": "2026-08-01T22:00:00.000Z",
"repoMeta": { "fullName": "facebook/react", "archived": false, "stargazersCount": 230000, "...": "..." },
"metrics": { "daysSinceLastCommit": 1, "commitsLast90Days": 100, "...": "..." },
"scoreBreakdown": { "commitRecency": 25, "commitActivity": 25, "issueResponsiveness": 17, "releaseCadence": 17 },
"score": 84,
"verdict": "actively maintained",
"reasoning": [
"Last commit 1 day ago (2026-07-31T...).",
"100+ commits in the last 90 days.",
"..."
]
}Scoring detail
Dimension | Points | Logic |
Commit recency | 0-25 | Days since last commit: <=14d->25, <=30d->21, <=90d->15, <=180d->9, <=365d->4, else 0 |
Commit activity | 0-25 | Commits in trailing 90 days: 0->0, 1-2->6, 3-9->13, 10-29->20, 30+->25 |
Issue/PR responsiveness | 0-25 | Of issues/PRs updated in the last 90 days: closed-ratio >=0.6 & median close <=14d->25, >=0.4->17, >=0.15->9, else->3. No recent activity -> neutral 14 |
Release cadence | 0-25 | Days since latest tagged release: <=180d->25, <=365d->17, <=730d->9, else 3. No releases ever -> neutral 12 |
archived: true from GitHub overrides the score-derived verdict entirely —
an archived repo is confirmed dead by the maintainer's own action, not
merely "likely abandoned."
What's real vs. limited
Real: every GitHub API call, the scoring math, and the MCP tool response are computed live at call time from that repo's actual GitHub data — nothing is hardcoded or mocked.
No auth against GitHub: uses GitHub's unauthenticated public REST API (60 requests/hour/IP shared across whoever runs this MCP server locally). A
check_repo_healthcall costs ~3-4 GitHub requests. Fine for free/local/low-volume MCP use; the paid Worker adds aGITHUB_TOKEN(5,000 req/hr) server-side.No caching: every call re-fetches GitHub live.
Local development
npm install
npm run dev # runs src/index.ts directly on stdio via tsx
npm run build # compiles to dist/ for the published npm package
npm run test:health # calls getRepoHealth() directly against real repos, no MCP transportsrc/github.ts, src/score.ts, src/health.ts, and src/types.ts are
the same GitHub-fetch + scoring logic as the paid Worker — this MCP server
is a thin src/index.ts wrapper around getRepoHealth().
When to use the paid HTTP twin instead
Use GET /repo-health/:owner/:repo
on the paid Worker instead of this MCP server when:
You're calling from outside an MCP client (plain HTTP, any language).
You need production/high-volume use and want to pay per call rather than share this MCP server's unauthenticated 60 req/hr GitHub budget.
Your agent already speaks x402 (e.g. via
x402-fetch/x402-axios) and can pay $0.01 USDC on Base per request.
Both routes call the exact same scoring function — output is identical.
License
MIT
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Tools
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMonitors and analyzes GitHub repository health by detecting stale branches, old pull requests, unresponsive issues, and security alerts. Integrates with MCP-compatible AI assistants and automation tools.Last updated1MIT
- Flicense-qualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automated GitHub repository quality management, enabling review, README generation, cleanup, and monitoring.Last updated
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides operational tooling over the GitHub API — issue triage, PR review monitoring, repo health audits, and team access reviews.Last updated111MIT
- Alicense-qualityCmaintenanceMCP server that checks npm and PyPI package health, providing maintenance signals, version info, CVE counts, and alternative suggestions.Last updatedMIT
Related MCP Connectors
Scan any public GitHub MCP-server repo for security issues. 37 MCP-specific L1 rules, 8 languages.
GitHub repo maintainability verdicts—maintained, slowing, at-risk, abandoned—via MCP.
An MCP server that gives your AI access to the source code and docs of all public github repos
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/liminalpepe/x402-repohealth-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server