Skip to main content
Glama
liminalpepe

agent-guard-mcp

by liminalpepe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-guard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • depguard

      mopanc
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP security server for AI coding agents. 12 tools: pre-install guardian, vulnerability audit, supply-chain attack detection via static code analysis, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation. Zero runtime dependencies.
      14
      9 npm
      15
      Apache 2.0

    • @arcwall/mcp-server

      rom-baro
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanning for AI coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) including secrets detection, MCP config vulnerabilities, agent instruction checks, threat modeling, prompt injection testing, pre-commit security checks, and dependency vulnerability scanning.
      7
      19 npm
      1
      MIT

    • repo-contract

      dager23
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces repository governance rules for AI coding agents, providing tools to validate plans, diffs, and scan for architectural and safety violations.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct security artifact (package, workflow, manifest, lockfile) with no overlap in purpose. An agent can clearly distinguish which tool to call for each verification task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a verb_noun pattern: 'check_package', 'check_workflow', 'score_manifest', 'verify_lockfile'. While 'check' is used twice, 'score' and 'verify' are different but still descriptive, maintaining a clear and predictable structure.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the set is concise and focused on common pre-installation and pre-merge security checks. Each tool addresses a specific need without unnecessary bloat, making the surface easy to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major security vetting areas: package typosquatting, CI workflow integrity, manifest backdoor analysis, and lockfile scanning. Minor gaps like environment or dependency drift checks exist, but the core use cases are well-addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources