Skip to main content
Glama
lilycip

Obra CTO

by lilycip
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Obra CTO

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • local-mcp-toolbox

      chriswayneh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure, local-first MCP server for read-only inspection and troubleshooting of development environments, exposing narrow, typed, auditable capabilities for repository inspection, log summarization, Docker review, and security scanning without granting unrestricted machine access.
      MIT

    • qrp-mcp

      StanimirTenev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that scans local codebases for quantum-vulnerable cryptography (secp256k1, Ed25519, RSA, etc.) and CI signing commands, classifying each finding as quantum-broken, post-quantum, or neither. It runs entirely locally with no network calls, providing a deterministic inventory for AI agents.
      4
      1,732 PyPI
      Apache 2.0

    • Repo Test Architect

      RepoAssay
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      ocal-first, read-only MCP server that audits repository test architecture across ten language ecosystems. It returns deterministic evidence-backed findings, blockers, rankings, and repository-native test plans without modifying source files.
      19
      278 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: scanning project signals, running tests, checking dependencies, preparing code review data, and producing the final score. Clear boundaries prevent misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., scan_project, run_tests) using snake_case, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools cover the full workflow of build readiness assessment without redundancy. The count is well-scoped for the domain, neither too sparse nor excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the entire lifecycle: initial scanning, testing, vulnerability checking, in-depth code review preparation, and final scoring. No obvious gaps for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources