Obra CFO
Related Servers
Alternatives to Obra CFO
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that scores your codebase's Build Readiness by reading code and running tests on your machine, outputting a diligence-grade score and risk register without uploading your source.577Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that reads startup pitch drafts from Notion to provide comprehensive investor-style analysis and scoring. It evaluates key areas like market opportunity and team strength, delivering feedback through a visual dashboard.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first production-readiness MCP server for AI-built apps. It runs read-only checks, produces an evidence-based readiness score, and guides fixes before launch.115Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.8721Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a local-first MCP server for AI-native software delivery, enabling structured specifications, human approval gates, controlled repository operations, verification evidence, review, and traceability.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first, LLM-agnostic MCP server that lets you ask hard questions about your documents, media, and code, and get traceable answers entirely offline.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct and clear purpose: deck_blueprint for creating a slide structure, prepare_assessment for reading materials and generating an assessment rubric, and score_funding_readiness for producing a readiness dashboard. There is no overlap or ambiguity among them.
The naming uses snake_case but mixes patterns: deck_blueprint is noun_noun, while prepare_assessment and score_funding_readiness are verb_noun. This inconsistency makes the set slightly less predictable, though still readable.
Three tools is a small but appropriate number for a focused funding readiness server. They cover a sequential workflow (blueprint → prepare → score). It is slightly minimal but not under-scoped for the stated purpose.
The tools cover the assessment and scoring stages but lack a tool for actual deck building or iteration (the blueprint tool instructs the agent to build the deck externally). There are notable gaps in the lifecycle, such as updating materials or handling follow-up actions.