Skip to main content
Glama
liliangshan

MCP Project Standards Server

by liliangshan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Project Standards Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ForgeCraft

      jghiringhelli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a quality framework and enforceable conventions for AI coding assistants, ensuring code quality, environment hygiene, and project standards across multiple AI tools.
      44 npm
      3
      -

    • Antigravity Agent Config

      greatpola
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides tools to manage, initialize, and synchronize standardized agent configurations and specialized workflows across various projects. It enables AI agents to access global rules and role-specific guidelines for development, design, and planning via the Model Context Protocol.
      7
      -

    • RulesetMCP

      n8daniels
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with queryable, version-controlled project rules and coding standards. Enables validation, rule-based guidance, and task summaries to keep AI work aligned with your project's conventions without repeating context.
      2
      MIT

    • local-mcp

      shworks-25
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely inspect, modify, and manage local projects with trusted filesystem access, safe Git operations, controlled task execution, and developer runtime process management over stdio or HTTP.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but api_debug and api_execute have overlapping functionality (both execute API requests), potentially causing confusion. The rest are well-separated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools use consistent underscore naming, but there is variation in verb usage (e.g., api_debug vs api_execute) and some tools like download_file or list_directory don't follow the noun_standards pattern. Overall acceptable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the count is well within the typical range for a server focused on project standards and API management, offering a balanced set without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core tasks for managing project standards, API configurations, and project structure, with only minor gaps like validation or application of standards. Generally comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources