get_rate_limits

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It identifies this as a read operation ('get'), but does not disclose whether this call itself consumes rate limit, or if any authentication is required. Minimal behavioral details beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence that front-loads the action and key outputs. Every word earns its place; no unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description adequately conveys the purpose and what the agent can expect (rate limit status with remaining and reset time). Could benefit from specifying the format of reset time, but for a minimal tool this is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters defined in the input schema. With 0 parameters, the description does not need to add parameter meaning beyond schema, which is already complete (100% coverage). Baseline score 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get current rate limit status' with specific outputs 'requests remaining and reset time'. It is a specific verb+resource combination: 'get' + 'rate limit status'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'get_info' or 'get_invoice_status'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool or when not to. No alternatives mentioned. For a simple status check, it might be self-explanatory, but the dimension expects explicit usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.