Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to classic-nlp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides MCP-compatible AI clients with offline text analysis and rewriting tools, including statistics, extractive summaries, keywords, readability scores, case conversion, entity extraction, and diffing, all running locally without API keys or network calls.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run fast, local, non-autoregressive System-1 decisions on text, including classification, triage, routing, and safety gating, via six typed tools with probabilistic outputs.
      8
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform exact, reproducible mechanical computation — text diffing, hashing, JSON querying, calendar arithmetic, deadline-bounded regex extraction, CSV parsing, similarity scoring, unit and base conversion — instead of relying on probabilistic guessing. Runs dependency-free, read-only and offline over stdio, with schema validation and hard caps on every operation so no call can hang the client.
      15
      44 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible agents to process documents, extract structured data, detect PII, and export LLM-ready datasets through natural language tool calls.
      8
      31 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform deterministic, model-free repository analysis and patch operations—tree-sitter repo maps, symbol/reference lookup, and SEARCH/REPLACE parsing/validation—via a CLI or MCP stdio server, without ever calling a language model.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct NLP capability, and the descriptions actively distinguish the near-neighbors (e.g. dependency_parse vs constituency_parse, noun_phrases vs keyword_extract vs openie_triples). The only mild overlap is between the individual analyzers and annotate_full, which is explicitly framed as an aggregator.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case, which is consistent, and most combine a domain noun with an operation (pos_tag, sent_split, seme_lookup, wordnet_similarity). A few deviate from a strict verb_noun pattern (plain 'tokenize', 'ner', 'sentiment' as bare capability names), but the set is still highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools sit squarely in the well-scoped range for an NLP toolkit, and each maps to a distinct capability (plus one legitimate aggregate). Nothing feels redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a full classic NLP pipeline: tokenization, POS/lemma, NER, keywords, sentence splitting, constituency/dependency parsing, noun phrases, OpenIE, sentiment, and lexical semantics, plus a batch aggregator. Minor gaps remain (no standalone language detection, coreference, or summarization/classification beyond sentiment), but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing