OneNote MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to OneNote MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets you talk to your OneNote notebooks, enabling search, reading, creating, and managing pages, sections, and notebooks via natural language. It connects directly to Microsoft Graph from your own computer, so your notes and credentials never leave your machine.13-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables natural language access to Microsoft OneNote notebooks, sections, and pages for reading and listing content.51MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI tools to Microsoft OneNote for Business via the Microsoft Graph API, enabling listing, creating, and updating notebooks, sections, and pages.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, write, and manage Microsoft OneNote notebooks, sections, and pages through OAuth-authenticated MCP tools, resources, and prompts.1627 npm5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft OneNote, allowing listing, reading, searching, and creating notes.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query and interact with Microsoft OneNote data via natural language, as part of the Pipeworx MCP gateway.182 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, but search_pages and find_pages are nearly identical in purpose, with find_pages described as a working alternative to a broken search endpoint. This creates a real selection hazard. Other pairs like list_sections and get_notebook_tree overlap somewhat but are differentiated by scope.
The overwhelming majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_notebooks, create_page, update_page, delete_page, copy_page. Minor deviations exist with auth_status and index, which are nouns rather than verb_noun actions, but the pattern remains predictable and readable.
18 tools is on the heavy side for a single-domain server and includes some redundancy, particularly search_pages/find_pages. The count is still within a usable range, but the set feels slightly bloated due to overlapping search functionality and support tools like index and resolve_page.
Page lifecycle coverage is solid: create, read, update, delete, list, search, and copy all exist. However, notebooks, sections, and section groups only support create/list, with no update, delete, or move operations, leaving noticeable structural management gaps. Search also has a redundant/broken path, which suggests incomplete cleanup of the tool surface.