Skip to main content
Glama
libering

OmniArchive-MCP

by libering

Related Servers

Alternatives to OmniArchive-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and LLM pipelines to fetch webpages and crawl sites locally, stripping noise and converting content to clean, token-efficient Markdown with preserved links, caching, and polite crawling.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to perform web search, scraping, and summarization outside their context window, receiving compact cited briefs via MCP while full pages are cached and viewable in a local web UI.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to mirror websites into a shared archive in the background, then browse projects, list and read text files, and run substring searches over the downloaded content. Concurrency isolation per project allows multiple sites to be mirrored in parallel with status polling over MCP.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch and crawl websites locally, extract main content, preserve links, and convert pages to clean Markdown with minimal token footprint.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents read any webpage as clean Markdown, crawl whole sites within configured limits, search without API keys, and solve supported captchas locally — all without cloud services or third-party keys.
      30
      20
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    archive_url and archive_and_cite both submit a URL for archiving, so an agent must decide between them; the citation convenience in archive_and_cite is the only real differentiator and descriptions acknowledge the overlap. retry_task and get_archive_status are clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All four names are verb-first snake_case (archive_url, retry_task, get_archive_status, archive_and_cite), which is predictable overall. The compound 'archive_and_cite' deviates slightly from the verb_noun pattern but remains readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools fit the narrow URL-archiving domain well: submit, check status, retry, and cite. It is a touch lean but each tool covers a distinct stage of the workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers submission, status polling, retry, and citation, but there is no way to list existing tasks, cancel a pending archive, or batch-submit URLs—notable gaps for managing multiple tasks during research.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues