get_generation_plan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. Description merely states it 'returns' data, implying a read operation, but lacks details on side effects, authorization needs, or rate limits. Could be improved with explicit read-only indication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but under-specified. It wastes no words but could include additional context without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, low parameter coverage, and absence of output schema details, the description is insufficient for an agent to fully understand tool behavior and return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the single parameter (plan_id). The parameter remains a raw string with no format or example.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it returns a dependency graph and step states, which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like create_generation_plan (create) and update_generation_step (update), but not from other get tools (e.g., get_design_scene).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No context provided for selection among sibling tools like get_design_scene or list_capsules.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.