Skip to main content
Glama
chatgpt-plugin-one-tool

chatgpt-plugin-one-tool

Related Servers

Alternatives to chatgpt-plugin-one-tool

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables computing maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure percentages against Black & Hyatt predicted values from age and sex, then deriving a 0–100 diaphragmatic resilience index and status. Also produces inspiratory muscle training prescriptions at 50% of measured MIP for personal-agent use.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to score English text readability with Flesch, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, and text statistics, without storing the submitted text.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to ask natural-language questions about their WHOOP recovery, sleep, HRV, strain, workouts, and body measurements, with tools for baselines, trends, sleep debt, period comparisons, and weekly health reviews.
      16 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic evaluation of static and moving tactile spatial acuity thresholds, mechanoreceptive density estimates, and peripheral neuropathy-related sensory guidance. It converts discrimination-distance and response-ratio trial inputs into acuity scores and actionable recommendations.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of misselection between competing options. Its purpose (scoring five WHO-5 item responses) is stated unambiguously, along with explicit negative guidance about what it must not be used for.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name `who5_score` is clear snake_case, combining a domain identifier with an action noun. With one tool there is no convention mixing to evaluate, and the name reads predictably.

    Tool Count4/5

    The server is explicitly designed as a one-tool plugin, and that tool is a deterministic computation that fully earns its place. The surface is deliberately minimal rather than accidentally thin, though one more tool (e.g. returning the questionnaire items) would add value.

    Completeness4/5

    For the stated purpose of scoring WHO-5 responses, the tool covers the whole operation: input validation, 0-100 raw score, and interpretation bands. The only gap is that it cannot surface the five item texts or the band thresholds as reusable data, so an agent must supply the questionnaire itself.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues