ride_place

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, and it supplies none. It says nothing about whether the tool reads or mutates data, what authentication it needs, what it returns, or how it relates to the saved-place CRUD siblings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The two-word fragment is short but not concise in a useful sense — it is under-specified rather than efficient. There is nothing to front-load because no substantive information is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with an undocumented parameter, no annotations, no output schema, and two closely related siblings, the description is completely inadequate. An agent has no basis for deciding when or how to invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one parameter (token) with 0% schema description coverage, and the description offers no information about what it is, whether it is required (it is listed as optional), or how it is used. The definition leaves the parameter entirely undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Saved places" is a noun fragment that restates the tool name rather than naming an action or explaining what the tool returns or does. It does not distinguish this tool from siblings ride_place_list and ride_place_add, leaving the agent unable to tell whether it reads, lists, or manages saved places.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no alternatives named, and no exclusions. The presence of ride_place_list and ride_place_add as siblings makes this omission especially costly, since nothing indicates when ride_place should be chosen over them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.