kcsc-design-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to kcsc-design-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients to search and read Korean Construction Standards (KCS/KDS) documents directly, using the KCSC OpenAPI.42-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceParses Excel/PDF construction calculations and retrieves Korean construction standards (KCSC/KDS/KCS) for AI-driven review, enabling automated structural calculation verification.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates Korea's government digital design system (KRDS) with AI assistants, enabling users to search components, validate code compliance, and access design tokens for Korean government digital services.91-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, retrieve, and analyze South Korean legal documents including statutes, precedents, constitutional decisions, and administrative rulings via the Ministry of Government Legislation Open API. Provides 89 specialized tools with features like legal abbreviation auto-recognition, annex extraction, and complex research chain workflows.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to retrieve real-time official Korean statistics from the KOSIS database through natural language queries, with source citations.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search by name vs. full-text grep, outline vs. read vs. formula retrieval, audit vs. version check, and the design_* tools each handle a different aspect (list, map, flow, validate, stamp, template). No two tools could be confused even without reading descriptions in detail.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: either kcsc_<action> (search, outline, read, formula, grep, audit, version) or design_<noun/action> (flows, map, flow, validate, stamp, template). The prefix group is uniform, and the second part is a clear, consistent descriptor.
13 tools is well within the ideal 3–15 range. The count reflects the domain's needs: 7 tools for standards retrieval/verification and 6 for design flow management, each earning its place without redundancy.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of standards lookup (search, outline, read, formula, grep), verification (audit, version), and design flow management (list, map, detailed steps, validation, stamping, template generation). Any gaps, like edit/delete of flows, are handled externally since flows are YAML files, and the deliberate separation of formula retrieval from reading addresses the image limitation.