verify_citation
Check if citations support the given answer, identifying missing or incorrect references.
Instructions
verify_citation
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| answer | Yes | ||
| citations | Yes |
Check if citations support the given answer, identifying missing or incorrect references.
verify_citation
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| answer | Yes | ||
| citations | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but offers no behavioral details. It fails to disclose any traits such as side effects, permissions, or return behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is brief but under-specifies the tool's functionality. Being concise is not beneficial when no useful information is conveyed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has two required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to provide essential context for an agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the two required parameters (answer, citations). The purpose of these parameters remains unexplained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tautological: description restates name/title.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_knowledge or list_documents. The description lacks any context for appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lhhub10086/MCP-Knowledge-Toolbox'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server