Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-procurement-manager

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes T54 x402 seller SKUs from OpenAPI as tools: contract triage, audit, and monitoring plus T54 commerce tools. HTTP 402 invoices are paid via x402_broker_client (XRPL / Base USDC depending on env); stdio for Cursor/Claude, Streamable HTTP for hosted use.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A thin stdio-to-HTTP bridge that forwards MCP messages to the hosted Proxycept server, enabling stdio-only MCP clients to access Proxycept's tool catalog.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to discover and call x402 paid services from a directory of over 2,000 APIs.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for the402.ai — an open marketplace where AI agents discover and purchase services from third-party providers via x402 micropayments (USDC on Base). Browse the catalog, purchase services, manage conversation threads, and list services as a provider.
      30
      88 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing 1,000+ pay-per-call API endpoints across agent infrastructure (memory, coordination, secrets, verification), data, compute, finance, weather, geography, and reference categories — payments via x402 protocol in USDC on Base.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    apm_quote and apm_preview both return free pricing information with no execution or payment, making their boundary somewhat fuzzy—one is a single price, the other a top-3 supplier comparison. Descriptions do clarify the distinction, but an agent must read carefully to pick correctly. apm_categories is clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All three tools share the apm_ prefix followed by a single descriptive noun/verb (quote, preview, categories), giving a predictable and readable pattern. Minor deviation in that 'quote' and 'preview' are verbs/nouns of different types, but overall consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    Three tools is thin for a procurement domain and feels borderline—especially since the surface stops at quoting and never reaches actual purchasing. The low count is coherent with a quote-only gateway, but leaves it feeling underbuilt.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is a dead end: it can quote prices, compare suppliers, and list categories, but there is no way to actually place an order or execute a purchase, nor check order status. For an 'agent procurement manager' the core transaction lifecycle is entirely missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues