Skip to main content
Glama
lgariv

SSH MCP Server

by lgariv
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to SSH MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ssh-mcp

      aposadm
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables remote server management via SSH, including command execution, file transfer (SFTP), and interactive shell sessions, with support for multiple hosts.
      -

    • mcp-ssh

      atlcomgit
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure SSH connections to remote servers for executing shell commands and managing active sessions. It supports authentication via passwords or private keys and provides optional host-based access control.
      4
      179 npm
      MIT

    • SSH MCP Server

      liang04
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure SSH connections to multiple remote servers with support for command execution, file transfers (SFTP), directory listing, and both password and key-based authentication.
      7
      MIT

    • SSH MCP Server

      kpanuragh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables remote server management through SSH and SFTP, supporting command execution, file transfers, and interactive shell sessions. It allows for multiple concurrent connections using either password or SSH key authentication.
      11
      9 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: ssh_run executes commands and returns results, while ssh_test_connection only tests connectivity and returns hostname. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'ssh_' prefix pattern with clear verb_noun naming (ssh_run and ssh_test_connection). The naming is predictable and follows the same convention throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, this server feels severely under-scoped for SSH operations. While the tools cover basic connectivity and command execution, there are many obvious missing SSH functionalities like file transfer, session management, or interactive operations.

    Completeness2/5

    For an SSH server, the surface is significantly incomplete. There's no file transfer (scp/sftp), no interactive shell capability, no key management, no port forwarding, and no session persistence. Agents will hit dead ends trying to perform common SSH tasks beyond basic command execution.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources