A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for reviewing code changes using LLMs, supporting Copilot, Ollama, and OpenAI-compatible endpoints.
MIT
codereview-mcp
by lfylow
Related Servers
Alternatives to codereview-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides agentic code review powered by OpenAI-compatible models, designed for use with Claude Code.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automated code review using AI agents. It analyzes code diffs or file paths for bugs, security issues, and style violations.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing AI-powered GitHub PR review as tools.5-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates pull request reviews using multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Groq, Perplexity) and supports GitHub and Bitbucket with real-time webhook integration and interactive AI assistant commands.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges CLI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, opencode, and Antigravity into any MCP client, enabling synchronous and asynchronous task execution, follow-up input, and a structured code review tool.221 npm1MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct input type: file, snippet, or git diff. The descriptions clearly differentiate them, leaving no ambiguity about when to use each.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the consistent 'review_<source>' pattern (review_code_file, review_code_snippet, review_git_diff), making naming predictable and clear.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools is appropriate for the code review domain, covering the main scenarios without being too few or too many.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the primary use cases: reviewing files, snippets, and diffs. Potential additions like reviewing a pull request or URL are missing but not essential.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues