Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to artifact-site

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to publish, retrieve, update, and delete hosted HTML, Markdown, Mermaid, and SVG artifacts and to create, list, or revoke shareable links through authenticated, scope-enforced tools. It exposes artifact hosting over Streamable HTTP so any MCP client can manage content on a self-hosted instance using a Bearer agent API key.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The artifact store for AI agents. Every output your agents produce — persisted, retrievable, shareable. Across runs, sessions, and tools. Session/agent metadata, content-hash dedup, and expiring share links; available on npm (@artifacta-mcp/mcp) and PyPI (artifacta-mcp).
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, agent-to-agent artifact exchange for LLM workflows. Enables MCP-capable tools like Claude, Codex, and Gemini to publish, list, read, update, and continue from artifacts without copying content through chat.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP-controlled artifact shelf for agents to publish generated content with stable preview URLs. Provides a shared SQLite registry and HTTP gallery for human browsing.
      3
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store, version, browse, search, and share artifacts in workspace drives and folders through MCP tools, with keys that gate which tools are offered. Uploads produce shareable public links and rendered previews, and the same bearer key works across the REST API and MCP transport.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource/action pair, but publish/update/edit and read/export/get_site have overlapping boundaries that rely on subtle distinctions. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could misselect between whole-artifact update and single-file edit.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The artifact_site_ prefix is used consistently, but suffixes mix verb forms (publish, read, export) with noun forms (connection, folders, get_site) and plural/singular comment_ vs comments_. Still readable and mostly predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 26 tools, the set exceeds the 25+ threshold considered too many. The broad domain justifies some size, but the large surface adds selection complexity and feels heavier than a typical well-scoped server.

    Completeness4/5

    The artifact lifecycle is thoroughly covered: publish, update, edit, delete, rollback, fork, move, share, export, uploads, and version inspection. Gaps include no comment creation/reply tools and no explicit share revocation, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week