Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to artifact-site

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to publish, retrieve, update, and delete hosted HTML, Markdown, Mermaid, and SVG artifacts and to create, list, or revoke shareable links through authenticated, scope-enforced tools. It exposes artifact hosting over Streamable HTTP so any MCP client can manage content on a self-hosted instance using a Bearer agent API key.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      The artifact store for AI agents. Every output your agents produce — persisted, retrievable, shareable. Across runs, sessions, and tools. Session/agent metadata, content-hash dedup, and expiring share links; available on npm (@artifacta-mcp/mcp) and PyPI (artifacta-mcp).
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, agent-to-agent artifact exchange for LLM workflows. Enables MCP-capable tools like Claude, Codex, and Gemini to publish, list, read, update, and continue from artifacts without copying content through chat.
      291 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP-controlled artifact shelf for agents to publish generated content with stable preview URLs. Provides a shared SQLite registry and HTTP gallery for human browsing.
      3
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to read and write Markdown documents, HTML pages, data files, PDFs, screenshots, and videos through a standard remote MCP server with OAuth, per-agent revocable project permissions, version history, and stable artifact links.
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource/action pair, but publish/update/edit and read/export/get_site have overlapping boundaries that rely on subtle distinctions. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could misselect between whole-artifact update and single-file edit.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The artifact_site_ prefix is used consistently, but suffixes mix verb forms (publish, read, export) with noun forms (connection, folders, get_site) and plural/singular comment_ vs comments_. Still readable and mostly predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 26 tools, the set exceeds the 25+ threshold considered too many. The broad domain justifies some size, but the large surface adds selection complexity and feels heavier than a typical well-scoped server.

    Completeness4/5

    The artifact lifecycle is thoroughly covered: publish, update, edit, delete, rollback, fork, move, share, export, uploads, and version inspection. Gaps include no comment creation/reply tools and no explicit share revocation, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week