artifact-site
Related Servers
Alternatives to artifact-site
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to publish, retrieve, update, and delete hosted HTML, Markdown, Mermaid, and SVG artifacts and to create, list, or revoke shareable links through authenticated, scope-enforced tools. It exposes artifact hosting over Streamable HTTP so any MCP client can manage content on a self-hosted instance using a Bearer agent API key.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceThe artifact store for AI agents. Every output your agents produce — persisted, retrievable, shareable. Across runs, sessions, and tools. Session/agent metadata, content-hash dedup, and expiring share links; available on npm (@artifacta-mcp/mcp) and PyPI (artifacta-mcp).81MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local, agent-to-agent artifact exchange for LLM workflows. Enables MCP-capable tools like Claude, Codex, and Gemini to publish, list, read, update, and continue from artifacts without copying content through chat.291 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that turns agent-generated Markdown, HTML, and text into persistent links, with tools to create, update, remove, list, and retrieve artifacts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP-controlled artifact shelf for agents to publish generated content with stable preview URLs. Provides a shared SQLite registry and HTTP gallery for human browsing.32 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to read and write Markdown documents, HTML pages, data files, PDFs, screenshots, and videos through a standard remote MCP server with OAuth, per-agent revocable project permissions, version history, and stable artifact links.8 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource/action pair, but publish/update/edit and read/export/get_site have overlapping boundaries that rely on subtle distinctions. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could misselect between whole-artifact update and single-file edit.
The artifact_site_ prefix is used consistently, but suffixes mix verb forms (publish, read, export) with noun forms (connection, folders, get_site) and plural/singular comment_ vs comments_. Still readable and mostly predictable.
At 26 tools, the set exceeds the 25+ threshold considered too many. The broad domain justifies some size, but the large surface adds selection complexity and feels heavier than a typical well-scoped server.
The artifact lifecycle is thoroughly covered: publish, update, edit, delete, rollback, fork, move, share, export, uploads, and version inspection. Gaps include no comment creation/reply tools and no explicit share revocation, but core workflows are complete.