Skip to main content
Glama
lewo-media

safe-mind-tools

Related Servers

Alternatives to safe-mind-tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Dashform (getaiform.com) - create and manage AI-powered forms, quizzes, and surveys. Supports form creation, response collection, analytics, and AI-driven form building with 15 tools across form management, response handling, and AI operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Public MCP server for agent-created, human-friendly, short-lived surveys. Enables agents to ask structured questions and retrieve answers.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Production-ready MCP server for Greenhouse ATS that provides comprehensive recruitment tools—screening, pipeline analytics, search, and safe write operations—across read-only, recruiter, and full profiles.
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Webmin system administration. 61 tools across 12 modules covering system monitoring, services, users, cron, packages, files, storage (SMART + LVM), security (Fail2ban), MySQL databases, Webmin ACL, and disk quotas. Four-tier safety framework with safe mode on by default. Python, MIT license, Docker and local deployment supported.
      61
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action: auth lifecycle (register, verify_email, get_api_key, me), read-only listings (surveys, departments, locations), creation (department, location, survey), and result retrieval (get_survey, get_analytics). Descriptions even cross-reference the right sibling tools (e.g. list_surveys points to get_survey and get_analytics). No two tools can be reasonably confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a predictable safe_mind_<verb>_<noun> pattern (list_surveys, create_department, get_analytics), and the shared prefix is applied uniformly. The only deviation is safe_mind_me, which lacks a verb and breaks the pattern slightly, plus register/verify_email omit an explicit noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool earns its place, covering auth, segmentation setup, survey lifecycle, and analytics without redundancy. Nothing feels padded or missing for the stated scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full intended workflow: onboarding/auth, department and location setup, survey creation and retrieval, and aggregated analytics, with idempotent creates. There is no update or delete for surveys, departments, or locations, but the descriptions explicitly note these are intentionally unavailable via the API, so the gaps are documented rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues