Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fast MCP Telegram

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that acts as a gateway to Telegram, providing AI-optimized tools for messaging, search, and chat management via MTProto. Supports multi-user authentication with QR login and HTTP/stdio transports.
      8
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to your real Telegram account via User API (MTProto). Features default-deny ACL with per-chat permissions, message search, file sending, forwarding, media downloads, and rate limiting.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server for Telegram with dual-mode Bot API and MTProto. 6 composite tools covering messages, chats, media, contacts management with 3-tier token optimization.
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Privacy-first Telegram MCP server enabling maintainers to triage chats, inspect context, search messages, draft replies, and send authorized messages locally without a cloud relay.
      557 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives MCP clients controlled access to a Telegram user account, letting them search and read messages, inspect chats, and fetch media, with sending or editing messages available only after explicit opt-in. It runs self-hosted over FastMCP and Telethon with strict read-only defaults, OAuth or bearer authentication, and an outbound-only Cloudflare Tunnel.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: get_messages vs search_messages_globally are clearly scoped (per-chat vs global), and send_message vs send_message_to_phone differ by target. However, get_messages and search_messages_globally could be confused when query terms are used, and find_chats vs get_chat_info have overlapping 'lookup' purposes. The descriptions help, but the boundaries between some retrieval tools are not entirely crisp.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern: get_messages, send_message, edit_message, find_chats, get_chat_info. The naming is clear and consistent for the read/write operations. However, there are two outliers: 'invoke_mtproto' uses a different style (verb_infrastructure) and 'send_message_to_phone' has a prepositional suffix that breaks the simple pattern, but overall the conventions are recognizable and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well within the ideal range (3-15). Each tool serves a distinct purpose: messaging (send/edit), retrieval (get/search), chat discovery (find/get), and low-level API access. It feels neither too thin nor too heavy, though a couple more specialized tools (e.g., for managing chat members or deleting messages) could be added, but the count is appropriate for a messaging-focused server.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core messaging lifecycle: send, edit, read, and search. It also handles chat discovery and metadata retrieval. However, there is a noticeable gap: there is no delete_message tool (though invoke_mtproto could be used for it with danger flags). Also, the server lacks tools for managing chats (e.g., create group, add members) or handling message reactions, but those are not essential for basic messaging workflows. The low-level invoke_mtproto fills some gaps, so coverage is good overall.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive