NoteKing MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to NoteKing MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables AI assistants to create, search, list, and delete notes with tags. Serves as a starter template for building custom MCP servers with tools and resources.1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, providing resources for accessing notes via URIs, tools for creating notes, and prompts for generating summaries.79 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.1216 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA stdio MCP server that lets AI coding assistants search, read, add, and review shared markdown notes in a team git repository, including teammate knowledge and recent work, without extra AI calls.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple note-taking system using low-level server components and streamable HTTP. It enables users to create, store, and summarize text notes through a set of tools, resources, and specialized prompts.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system with resources, tools for creating notes, and prompts for summarization.-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and the note/project/attachment boundaries are clear. Minor overlap exists: update_note can also change pinned status while toggle_pin exists, and get_note returns attachment info while list_attachments is a separate tool.
All tools follow a consistent noteking_verb_noun snake_case pattern. Variants like append_to_note, toggle_pin, and render_markdown still fit the same predictable convention.
The 18-tool surface is somewhat large but reasonable for a full note workspace covering notes, projects, attachments, pinning, stats, and markdown rendering. A few tools could be consolidated, but each broadly earns its place.
CRUD coverage for notes and projects is strong, with useful extras like append, pinning, stats, and rendering. The main gap is attachment retrieval/download: attachments can be listed, uploaded, and deleted, but their content cannot be fetched directly.