No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes, and the memorable_ prefix plus descriptive names helps selection. There is some intentional overlap between search, list_memories-with-query, and recall_context, and between toggle_pin and update_memory's pinned field, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.
All tools use the same memorable_ prefix and snake_case naming convention, typically verb_noun or verb_object. The pattern is highly predictable across memory, attachment, embedding, pin, and utility tools.
Seventeen tools is slightly above the ideal compact range but still reasonable for a memory workspace with search, embeddings, pins, attachments, rendering, and stats. Each tool has a plausible role, though a few convenience tools could be consolidated.
The surface covers the full memory lifecycle: create, read, update, append, delete, search, semantic neighbors, embeddings, pinned ordering, attachments, rendering, and stats. No obvious dead ends remain for core memory-management workflows.