Find discounted PC component deals with current price and lowest price in 90 days. Filter by category and page to compare offers across Brazilian stores.
Ofertas atuais com desconto no meupc.net, com preço atual e menor preço em 90 dias
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Número da página | |
| category | No | Filtrar por categoria (ex: 'processadores', 'placas-video', 'memorias') |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full burden. It mentions the data returned but lacks details on pagination behavior, whether category filtering is supported (only hinted by schema), or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, well-structured sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose and key data points, with no superfluous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple nature of a list tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential purpose and data fields. However, it could mention that results are paginated and that the category filter is optional for full completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds context about the tool's output but does not elaborate on parameter usage beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Ofertas atuais com desconto' (current deals with discount) and specifies the included data (current price, lowest price in 90 days), distinctly differentiating from sibling tools focused on builds and components.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The context implies use when searching for discounted items on meupc.net, and siblings cover builds/components, but no explicit when-not or alternative naming is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.