Skip to main content
Glama
leonardoceron-yvy

mcp-pipedrive

by leonardoceron-yvy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-pipedrive

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      ckalima
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage Pipedrive CRM data including deals, contacts, and activities directly through an AI assistant. It supports full CRUD operations, email engagement analysis, and mapping of custom field metadata for comprehensive pipeline management.
      123
      118 npm
      8
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      ericluciano
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with the Pipedrive CRM to manage deals, contacts, organizations, and activities. It features automatic custom field synchronization and guided onboarding to ensure assistants follow specific business rules and pipelines.
      37 npm
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      osherai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs like Claude to interact with Pipedrive CRM data through a standardized interface, providing 22 tools for managing deals, persons, organizations, activities, and more.
      22
      1
      MIT

    • Pipedrive MCP

      expertintegrado
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Pipedrive CRM via Claude Code, allowing users to manage deals, contacts, activities, and more through conversational commands.
      26
      11 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists between composite tools like attach_contact_to_deal and atomic ones (create_person, link_person_to_deal). Overall clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    28 tools is slightly high but covers the core functionality of deals, custom fields, activities, and backups without feeling bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    Missing delete operations for persons and organizations, and no listing endpoints for persons or organizations. Deal lifecycle is well-covered, but other entities are incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources