gupy-candidate-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| buscar_vagasC | Busca vagas públicas no Gupy com filtros opcionais. |
| detalhe_vagaA | Detalha uma vaga pelo ID. |
| carregar_perfilB | Carrega e valida o perfil do candidato a partir de um arquivo JSON. |
| analisar_aderenciaB | Analisa a aderência do perfil a uma vaga. |
| prepararA | Gera a entrega (currículo, carta ou formulário) para uma vaga com base no perfil. |
| monitorarB | Monitora os prazos de inscrição de uma lista de vagas. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct stage of the candidate workflow: searching jobs, viewing details, loading a profile, analyzing fit, preparing application materials, and monitoring deadlines. There is no overlapping or ambiguous functionality.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (buscar_vagas, carregar_perfil, analisar_aderencia, preparar, monitorar), but 'detalhe_vaga' uses a noun phrase instead of a verb, creating a minor inconsistency.
Six tools cover the core application lifecycle without being excessive or too sparse. Each tool serves a clear purpose within the candidate-oriented workflow.
The toolset covers searching, profiling, fit analysis, preparation, and monitoring, but lacks a tool for actually submitting the application, which is a notable gap. However, the existing tools still support a coherent end-to-end assistance flow.