mcp-teste-llm2
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-teste-llm2
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server enabling text-to-SQL on PostgreSQL databases using a CrewAI multi-agent system. It generates and executes read-only SQL queries from natural language, with security layers against prompt injection.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for PostgreSQL that enables safe database introspection and querying via natural language.300 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePostgreSQL MCP server that converts natural language to SQL and executes queries, with multi-database support and robust read-only safety checks.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for safely querying PostgreSQL from an LLM, with read-only default mode, multi-connection aliases, and session-enforced safety.11 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for querying Brazilian CNES health establishment data in PostgreSQL, enabling AI-assisted database exploration and analysis.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying artist royalty performance in Brazilian Portuguese, using natural language, charts, and PDF reports from a Postgres database.-
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Tools are largely distinct by resource and operation, with clear guidance in descriptions (e.g., use buscar_ticket_por_numero for ticket numbers, resumo_* for aggregations). However, the generic listar_tickets overlaps with several specialized listar_tickets_* tools that filter by status, operator, or recency, which could lead to occasional misselection. Descriptions usually resolve the ambiguity, so the set is mostly clear.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern in Portuguese: listar_*, buscar_*, resumo_*, and analisar_*. The structure is predictable and reflects the tool's purpose. No mixed conventions or cryptic names.
With 24 tools, the server is on the heavy side for a ticket system, and several aggregation or listing tools could potentially be consolidated (e.g., resumo_tickets_por_* dimensions). Each tool does have a distinct purpose, but the volume feels borderline excessive. A leaner surface might reduce cognitive load.
The tool set covers reading, listing, searching, and aggregating tickets but lacks any mutation operations: no create, update, delete, assign, transition, or comment tools. For a ticket management domain, this is a significant gap that prevents agents from performing core lifecycle actions. The server appears read-only, which limits its utility as a complete ticket system interface.