oh-my-laya
Related Servers
Alternatives to oh-my-laya
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLaya-MLX as an MCP server (and plain-HTTP API). It answers typed decisions — choose an option / score a rubric / is this true? — on your own machine (Apple Silicon / MLX), with no cloud and ~10ms after warm-up. Not a chatbot. No token-by-token text, no JSON that can break. One forward pass returns a structured answer you can branch on. Ideal for routing, triage, classification, lead scoring, and gMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local, read-only Laya typed decisions for Codex, providing classification, scoring, truth-probability, batch decision, and token-budget planning tools on Apple Silicon.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables typed decisions (choice/score/noul) from Laya-MLX over MCP on Apple Silicon, without text generation.3Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running MCP tools against local MLX models on your Mac, with hardware-aware configuration, CLI streaming, and a dashboard for routing and monitoring.7,040 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local typed decision-making over MCP Streamable HTTP, running Laya and Von models to turn arbitrary state into choice, score, and yes/no answers with probabilities.3Do What The F*ck You Want To Public
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal multimodal MCP server for vision, document, audio, video, and GUI automation, all processed locally on Apple Silicon for privacy and security.9-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
laya_tell_me runs a typed decision while laya_advisor_preferences reads/saves configuration policy, so their core purposes are distinct. The shared 'advisor' vocabulary and overlapping policy/recommendation language create minor potential confusion, but an agent can tell them apart.
Both names use a consistent laya_ snake_case prefix, which is good. However the second element is inconsistent in style: laya_tell_me is an imperative verb phrase while laya_advisor_preferences is a noun phrase, breaking a predictable pattern.
Two tools is thin for a server that apparently covers decision execution, model catalog advice, policy configuration, and squad setup. Much functionality appears overloaded into these two, which is borderline rather than comfortably scoped.
The domain (advisory decisions plus preference management) seems approximated by running decisions and configuring policy. There is no separate operation to inspect models, ceilings, or squad state independently, so several capabilities are only reachable indirectly.