oh-my-laya
Related Servers
Alternatives to oh-my-laya
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLaya-MLX as an MCP server (and plain-HTTP API). It answers typed decisions — choose an option / score a rubric / is this true? — on your own machine (Apple Silicon / MLX), with no cloud and ~10ms after warm-up. Not a chatbot. No token-by-token text, no JSON that can break. One forward pass returns a structured answer you can branch on. Ideal for routing, triage, classification, lead scoring, and gMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running MCP tools against local MLX models on your Mac, with hardware-aware configuration, CLI streaming, and a dashboard for routing and monitoring.2,456 npm-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal multimodal MCP server for vision, document, audio, video, and GUI automation, all processed locally on Apple Silicon for privacy and security.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables local Apple on-device Foundation Model access via any MCP client, supporting text generation, structured output, and multi-turn chat on macOS.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes locally hosted MLX models as MCP tools for Claude Desktop and Codex, with optional SearXNG search augmentation for private local inference.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes Apple's on-device 3B parameter LLM to Claude Code and Claude Desktop via MCP. Zero API cost, fully private, runs on Neural Engine.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct by default.
The name 'laya_tell_me' is readable and uses a consistent imperative style with a product prefix. Since there is only one tool, there is no conflicting naming convention to penalize heavily.
A single tool feels quite thin for a server, even if the intended scope is narrow. It is borderline and could benefit from at least one supporting tool, such as model inspection or configuration.
The tool appears to cover the advertised decision types: choice, score, and yes/no probability. Minor gaps like model management or detailed output explanations exist, but the core decision workflow is functional.