F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Trello boards, lists, cards, comments, checklists, labels, and members through natural language.
16
-
trello-sumar
Related Servers
Alternatives to trello-sumar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Trello boards, lists, cards, labels, checklists, members, comments, and attachments through natural language.234 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Trello boards, cards, lists, and more through a standardized interface.-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceConnects Trello with AI assistants to manage boards, lists, cards, and comments via natural language.118MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Trello boards through natural language, supporting board operations including card management, list manipulation, attachments, labels, comments, checklists, and daily workflow automation.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Trello boards, cards, lists, and more through a secure local connection, supporting search, card management, collaboration, and organization features.2033 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool targets a distinct reporting question: boards, full summary, short status, priorities, and recent activity. sumar_projektu and stav_projektu are the closest pair, but their descriptions clearly separate a complete templated summary from a shorter done/doing/todo status.
Naming Consistency3/5
Names are all lowercase and domain-relevant, but the pattern is not uniform: zoznam_boardov, sumar_projektu and stav_projektu are two-word noun phrases, while priority and aktivita are single nouns. The naming is readable and predictable enough, but it is not a consistent verb_noun scheme.
Tool Count5/5
Five tools is a well-scoped set for a Trello summary/status server; each covers a distinct aspect and none feel redundant. It is neither too thin nor overloaded.
Completeness4/5
The core reporting domain is well covered: board discovery, full summary, status, priorities, and recent activity. The only minor gap is lack of a raw card/list detail tool, but agents can usually get the needed information through the existing summary and priority tools.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues