Skip to main content
Glama
lemonadesaltbagel

teardown-observe

by lemonadesaltbagel
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to teardown-observe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • apire

      Mnehmos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables passive reconstruction of an application's HTTP endpoints, WebSocket/event surfaces, payload schemas, and process architecture purely by observing labeled traffic, logs, and process metadata — never by sending requests to the target. Findings carry evidence levels and confidence, and can be exported as OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, JSON Schema, protocol catalogs, architecture maps, and candidate MCP capability surfaces.
      MIT

    • Jukeyman Unleashed

      jukeyman
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to take software apart over MCP — native binaries, Go/Rust/.NET assemblies, WASM and EVM bytecode, Android and Flutter apps, firmware, databases, crashes and network captures — returning findings backed by code, references and explicit unknowns. Drives deep-analysis engines such as Hopper, Ghidra, IDA, JADX and Frida entirely locally, letting agents explain behavior or rebuild a feature in your own project.
      538,483 npm
      MIT

    • Fathom

      qompassai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript/Electron applications, .NET assemblies, web captures, EVM bytecode, and process behavior through a provider-neutral MCP interface. Every result is an evidence envelope stating what was observed, derived, unexamined, or unprovable, with all capabilities gated by a deterministic fail-closed policy engine.
      Apache 2.0

    • FEA

      surajse
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to turn authorized software artifacts into verified working reimplementations through behavioral capture, clean-room synthesis, differential parity verification, and evidence-pack export. It supports CLI binaries and HTTP APIs, with policy controls and vector fuzzing.
      MIT

    • MCP QA Lab

      efficjump
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Evidence-driven quality testing for Model Context Protocol servers. It connects as a real client, captures the complete model-facing contract, identifies agent-usability risks, measures context cost, and executes only explicitly approved target calls.
      8
      MIT

    • REA

      xingruochun
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Serves 170 reverse-engineering tools over a local stdio MCP process, letting an agent drive disassembly, decompilation, and dynamic analysis through the engines already installed on the user's machine (Ghidra, Hopper, IDA, JEB, JADX, adb, mitmproxy, Chrome). Binaries never leave the host, and every finding comes back with an evidence contract covering evidence ids, capture tool, coverage, and explicit unknowns.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Let your AI agent see the webWeb-to-screenshot MCP for Claude, Cursor and Codex. No cookie banners. Free to start.snap-render.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools map to distinct workflow stages such as open_target, discover_ui, probe_web_field, and release_spec, but rule/claim checking and the multiple list_* introspection tools overlap conceptually. An agent may struggle to choose between check_rules/propose_claim/falsify_claim or list_rules/list_claims, and the large surface increases misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are predominantly verb_noun (retract_rule, probe_cli, review_spec), with only coverage, blocked_hosts, and api_contract as noun-only exceptions. The probe_web_field versus probe_cli split is a minor inconsistency but overall the naming is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    31 tools exceeds the 25-tool threshold and includes several narrow introspection/listing tools such as list_claims, list_rules, list_feature_unknowns, list_tickets, blocked_hosts, and api_contract that could be consolidated. The multi-target workflow explains some breadth, but the surface is heavy for an agent to manage.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers target intake, UI/CLI discovery, field/CLI probing, sequences, flows, rules/claims, coverage, unknowns, docs, spec compile/review/release, tickets, audit, and mapping. Minor gaps exist around session/target listing or closing and claim lifecycle cleanup, but the core teardown-to-release workflow is well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources