Navigates forward in the embedded WKWebView history on a Lemon-enabled iPhone, enabling AI clients to move to the next page.
Navigates forward in the Lemon iOS embedded WKWebView history.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the navigation action but omits what happens when no forward history exists, whether it triggers a page load, required permissions, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple navigation tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter navigation tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the core action but lacks context on prerequisites, failure modes, and how it relates to sibling navigation tools. It is minimally adequate but incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100%. Per the rules, a 0-parameter tool receives a baseline of 4; there is nothing to clarify beyond that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Specific verb 'Navigates forward' and resource 'Lemon iOS embedded WKWebView history' clearly state what the tool does. It distinguishes itself from the sibling go_back_web_page by direction, so an agent can identify it without opening the schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternatives are provided. It does not state that forward history must exist or mention go_back_web_page as the counterpart. Usage is only vaguely implied by the action itself.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.