Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agy-ollama-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local AI agents to generate code and interact with Google Antigravity (Gemini Pro) via MCP, consuming zero API tokens.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to invoke Google Antigravity's Gemini coding agent for repository-aware file operations, command execution, code review, test generation, and quota checks, while also providing a standalone dual-mode CLI.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server wrapping local Ollama models for offload from API-priced orchestrators. Nine stdio tools - generation, summarisation, analysis, drafting, code tasks (docstring/test/explain/review/types/refactor-suggest), diff-driven tasks (commit-message/pr-description/changelog/summary/impact), mechanical transforms, and model management (list/pull). Apache-2.0.
      20 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools have significant overlap: local_summarize_and_extract, local_chunked_summary, and local_map_reduce_file all perform summarization/compression with only subtle differences. This can confuse an agent about which to use. Other tools are clearer, but the redundant trio lowers the score.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools use a 'local_' prefix and snake_case, which is consistent, but the names are not fully uniform: 'summarize_and_extract' combines two actions while others use a single verb, and 'chunked_summary' vs 'map_reduce_file' are stylistic variations. The patterns are mostly consistent but not perfectly aligned.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is a reasonable, well-scoped number for a local Ollama helper. It covers core operations without being overwhelming, fitting comfortably within the typical 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the main capabilities (code generation, summarization, extraction, model management, prewarming) well. However, the presence of three overlapping summarization tools suggests redundancy rather than a missing feature; the domain appears largely covered, with minor gaps like model downloading or inference not being addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues